Skip to content

DUROGRIP BM026RRecalls & reported problems

Aesculap AG · DUROGRIP TC Needleholder, straight, 7 7/8", (200 mm), very delicate, with 0.2 mm pitch of serration, suture 6/0 - 10/0, non-sterilereusable · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04038653028047), received between Jun 7, 2024 and Jun 7, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 7, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    ACCORDING TO MEDWATCH USER FACILITY REPORT (B)(4): 1ST SURGERY [DATE REDACTED] - FOLLOWING AN OPEN VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ONE OF THE NEEDLE DRIVERS USED IN THE FASCIAL CLOSURE OF THE ABDOMEN WAS BROKEN AT THE TIP OF THE INSERT. THE FIELD WAS SEARCHED FOR THIS SMALL PIECE. AT THE TIME IT WAS IDENTIFIED, THE FASCIA AND ABOVE WAS CLOSED. AN X-RAY WAS THEN OBTAINED. THE ATTENDING RADIOLOGIST READ THAT THERE WAS A 2 MM METALLIC DENSITY PROJECTING OVER THE RIGHT UPPER QUADRANT ON AP RADIO-GRAPH. ON LATERAL RADIOGRAPH, THE METALLIC DENSITY IS APPROXIMATELY 3.1 CM DEEP TO THE FASCIA AND 7.0 CM FROM THE SKIN SURFACE. IT WAS UNCLEAR IF THIS WAS IN THE PERITONEAL CAVITY OR IN THE EXTRAPERITONEAL SPACES WHICH WOULD DETERMINE THE OPERATIVE RISK OF RE-EXPLORATION. A CT OF THE ABDOMEN WAS OBTAINED TO HELP FURTHER LOCALIZE THE FRAGMENT AND IT WAS FOUND TO BE LIKELY IN THE RETRORECTUS SPACE. RISK AND BENEFITS DISCUSSION WERE HELD WITH THE PATIENT AND SHE ELECTED TO UNDERGO AN EXPLORATORY SURGERY TO REMOVE THE FOREIGN BODY. 2ND SURGERY 1 DAY LATER [DATE REDACTED]- THE SURGEON EXPLORED THE LATERAL UPPER SPACE OF THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE ABDOMEN NEAR THE NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE IN THE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19492908 ↗

Other HOLDER, NEEDLE; ORTHOPEDIC devices

All HOLDER, NEEDLE; ORTHOPEDIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page