Skip to content

PaediGAV® FV288TRecalls & reported problems

Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · PAEDI-SHUNTASSTISTANT 10 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PaediGAV (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906113001), received between May 7, 2021 and May 18, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Infusion or Flow Problem4
  • Mechanical Problem2

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 18, 2026Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PAEDIESA VALVE (#FV288T) WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE CAUSED AN OVER-DRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. SAME EVENT AS #: 3004721439-2026-00141.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 25200135 ↗
  • InjuryJan 27, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SHUNTASSISTANT (PART # FV288T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE IN COMBINATION WITH A PROGAV 2.0 WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATING IN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 17 YEARS, HEIGHT: 153 CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: 57 KILOGRAMS (KG), GENDER: FEMALE. SAME EVENT AS MEDWATCH#3004721439-2022-00435 AND 3004721439-2022-00436.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 16258210 ↗
  • InjuryJan 7, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PAEDI SHUNTASISSTANT (PART # FV288T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO HAVE A SHUNT DYSFUNCTION. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6), HEIGHT: 148 CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: (B)(6) GENDER: UNKNOWN. ITS SAME PATIENT AS MDR ID #3004721439-2021-00345 AND MDR ID # 3004721439-2021-00347.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 13193800 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT A SHUNT ASSISTANT WAS NOT FUNCTIONING AS EXPECTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS NOT WORKING PROPERLY WHEN PUT TOGETHER AND INLINE, BUT EACH COMPONENT (RESERVOIR, VALVE, & SHUNT ASSIST) SEEMED TO WORK INDIVIDUALLY. THE SURGEON TOOK OUT THE VALVE SYSTEM AND REPLACED IT WITH ALL NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME PRODUCT. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. FURTHER DETAILS WERE NOT PROVIDED. WEIGHT: (B)(6). ASSOCIATED MEDWATCH: 3004721439-2021-00765.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12919455 ↗
  • InjuryMay 7, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PAEDISA (#FV288T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN 2011 . ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATING IN UNDERDRIANAGE. THE VENTRICLE WERE NARROWED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6), HEIGHT:142 CM, WEIGHT: (B)(6). GENDER: FEMALE. SAME EVENT: MEDWATCH 3004721439-2021-00106.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 11790192 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page