Skip to content

PaediGAV® FV301TRecalls & reported problems

Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · PAEDIGAV SYSTEM W/BURRHOLE RESV.9/29 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PaediGAV (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906116361), received between Oct 20, 2021 and Mar 2, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Infusion or Flow Problem2

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 2, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PAEDIGAV (PART # FV301T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN 2016. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATING IN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 16474573 ↗
  • InjuryOct 20, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED TO MIETHKE THAT A PAEDIGAV SYSTEM W/BURRHOLE RESV.9/29 (PART # FV301T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, A DYSFUNCTION OF THE VALVE OCCURRED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON AN (B)(6) 2017. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12665329 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page