proGAV® FV413TRecalls & reported problems
Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 20 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of proGAV (28)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Miethke proGAV programmable shunt valve is implanted in the skull to drain fluid from the brain in patients with hydrocephalus. The 31 reports all describe injuries, mostly over- or under-drainage of fluid and valves that were hard to adjust, with patients in their teens and children; several needed revision surgery. No deaths were reported. There are no recalls for this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 31
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 31
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 31 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906132101), received between Jan 13, 2021 and Jul 3, 2025 — classified as 31 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (23 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Mechanical Problem23
- Infusion or Flow Problem21
- No Apparent Adverse Event1
- Obstruction of Flow1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- Hydrocephalus31
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 31 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 3, 2025Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (#FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2010. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 22394323 ↗InjuryJan 15, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Obstruction of Flow; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNTSYSTEM (#FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN UNDERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 21157241 ↗InjuryNov 27, 2024Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNTSYSTEM (#FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 20800311 ↗InjuryAug 27, 2024Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (#FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN 2014. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM SHOWED AN OVER-DRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6)2024. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 10 YEARS, 2 MONTHS, WEIGHT: 29.4 KGS, HEIGHT: 141 CM, GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 20074736 ↗InjuryJan 19, 2024Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (#FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON OCTOBER 2011. (2011 ACCORDING TO QUESTIONNAIRE, PRODUCTION DATE IN 2013) ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE SHOWED AN OVER-DRAINAGE AND ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 13 YEARS. WEIGHT: 80 KGS. HEIGHT: 150 CM. GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 18544433 ↗InjuryMay 11, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (#FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 16 YEARS. HEIGHT: 128 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 35 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16914702 ↗InjuryApr 18, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 17 YEARS HEIGHT: 160 CENTIMETERS (CM) WEIGHT: 45 KILOGRAMS (KG) GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16765985 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (#FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVERDRAINAGE AND DIFFICULT TO ADJUST. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 17 YEARS. HEIGHT: 174 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 60 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16742972 ↗InjuryMar 28, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVER-DRAINAGE AND NON-ADJUSTABLE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 15 YEARS. WEIGHT: 90 KILOGRAMS (KG). HEIGHT: 140 CENTIMETERS (CM). GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16632579 ↗InjuryMar 3, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVER-DRAINAGE AND ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 13 YEARS. HEIGHT: 160 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 53 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16482774 ↗InjuryJan 10, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2013. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVERDRAINAGE AND DIFFICULT TO ADJUST. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 10 YEARS, 3 MONTHS. HEIGHT: 144 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 47 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16134899 ↗InjuryDec 15, 2022Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON UNKNOWN. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE AND NON-ADJUSTABILITY. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 12 YEARS. HEIGHT: 160 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 45 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15991942 ↗InjuryNov 16, 2022Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNTSYSTEM (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2014. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE AND DIFFICULT TO ADJUST. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 11 YEARS, HEIGHT: 162 CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: 59 KILOGRAMS (KG), GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15810384 ↗InjuryNov 16, 2022Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNTSYSTEM (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVERDRAINAGE AND DIFFICULT TO ADJUST.. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 12 YEARS. HEIGHT: 150 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 40 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15809931 ↗InjuryOct 7, 2022Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN 2012. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 11 YEARS, HEIGHT: 165 CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: 60 KILOGRAMS (KG), GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15566778 ↗InjuryJun 8, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNTSYYTEM (PART #FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATING IN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6), HEIGHT: (B)(6), WEIGHT: (B)(6), GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 14631480 ↗InjuryJun 8, 2022Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATING IN OVERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 11 YEARS. HEIGHT: 140 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 36,9 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: MALE. SAME EVENT AS MEDWATCH-NO. 3004721439-2022-00147.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 14631337 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT A PROGAV WAS NOT ADJUSTABLE POSTOPERATIVELY. THE VALVE WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2011. THE VALVE WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2017 AND RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. FURTHER DETAILS WERE NOT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 12990372 ↗InjuryDec 9, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO MIETHKE THAT A PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 20 (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2009. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE BLOCKED AND NOT ADJUSTABLE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2017. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. FURTHER DETAILS WERE NOT PROVIDED. PATIENT INFORMATION: AGE: (B)(6), WEIGHT : (B)(6), HEIGHT: 113CM.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 12969654 ↗InjuryDec 8, 2021Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED MIETHKE THAT A PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 20 (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2012. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS NOT ABLE TO BE ADJUSTED AND WAS BLOCKED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2017. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 12961822 ↗InjuryDec 8, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO MIETHKE THAT A PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 20 (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2011. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE BRAKE WAS DEFECTIVE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2017. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. (B)(6). HEIGHT: UNKNOWN. GENDER: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 12961571 ↗InjuryDec 6, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT A PROGAV WAS BLOCKED POSTOPERATIVELY. THE VALVE WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2010. IT WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO THE MALFUNCTION AND RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. FURTHER DETAILS WERE NOT PROVIDED. HEIGHT: 114 CM, WEIGHT: (B)(6).
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 12940152 ↗InjuryDec 6, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT A PROGAV WAS BLOCKED AND NOT ADJUSTABLE POSTOPERATIVELY. THE VALVE WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2014. IT WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO THE MALFUNCTION AND RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER. FURTHER DETAILS WERE NOT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 12940131 ↗InjuryNov 3, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED MIETHKE THAT A PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 20 (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE ADJUSTED ON ITS OWN. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2017. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6). WEIGHT: (B)(6). HEIGHT: UNKNOWN. GENDER: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 12746643 ↗InjurySep 24, 2021Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED MIETHKE THAT A PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 20 (PART # FV413T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN 2013. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, A BLOCKAGE OF THE VALVE OCCURRED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2016. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6). WEIGHT: (B)(6). HEIGHT: (B)(6). GENDER: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 12529315 ↗
Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices
- NATUS EDS3 DRAINAGE SYSTEM NT821731CNatus Medical Incorporated · Shunt, Central Nervous System And Components1 recall208 reports
- Exacta™ 46700Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 recall2 deaths163 reports
- Strata® 42866Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 death160 reports
- proGAV 2.0® FX410TChristoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · Shunt, central nervous system and components119 reports
- Becker® 46128Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 recall50 reports
- PROGAV 2.0 FX643TAesculap AG · Shunt, central nervous system and components100 reports
- M.BLUE PLUS FX804TAesculap AG · Shunt, central nervous system and components82 reports
- proSA® FV701TChristoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · Shunt, central nervous system and components82 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page