miniNAV® FV660TRecalls & reported problems
Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · MININAV VALVE 10 · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 11
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906133085), received between Mar 18, 2021 and Nov 24, 2025 — classified as 11 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Infusion or Flow Problem5
- Obstruction of Flow3
- Excess Flow or Over-Infusion2
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Reflux within Device1
Patient problems
- Hydrocephalus9
- Failure of Implant2
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 24, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Infusion or Flow Problem; Obstruction of Flow; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MINNAV (#FV660T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS REVISED, DUE TO A FLOW BACK. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS NOW SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 23631288 ↗InjuryNov 17, 2025Reflux within Device; Reflux within Device
ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT A MININAV VALVE 10 "PART#: FV660T" WAS IMPLANTED ON AN UNSPECIFIED DATE. REPORTEDLY THE VALVE WAS TAKEN OUT OF THE PATIENT BECAUSE "THE ARROW WAS POINTED DISTALLY."
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 23573193 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow
IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A MININAV VALVE 10 (PART# FV660T) WAS IMPLANTED ON AN UNSPECIFIED DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT THERE WAS A SHUNT MALFUNCTION RESULTING IN A SHUNT REVISION. UPON TESTING OF THE MINI NAV (FLUSH WITH NACL) THE FLUID DID NOT PASS THROUGH MINI NAV. THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER AIC REFERENCE: (B)(4).
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 21397811 ↗InjuryFeb 13, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MINIVAV VALVE 10 (#FV660T) WAS IMPLANTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE CAUSED AN UNDERDRAINAGE / BLOCKAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 21373906 ↗InjuryOct 10, 2024Excess Flow or Over-Infusion; Excess Flow or Over-Infusion
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MININAV (#FV660T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 10 MONTHS. HEIGHT: 50 CM. WEIGHT: 6 KG. GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 20424032 ↗InjuryOct 10, 2024Excess Flow or Over-Infusion; Excess Flow or Over-Infusion
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MININAV (#FV660T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 9 MONTHS, HEIGHT: 65 CM, WEIGHT: 7 KG, GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 20422262 ↗InjuryAug 9, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MININAV (#FV660T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SHOWED AN UNDER-DRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 8 MONTHS, WEIGHT: 5.5 KILOGRAMS (KG), HEIGHT: 63 CENTIMETERS (CM), GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 17494366 ↗InjuryOct 5, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MININAV(PART # FV660T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN COMBINATION WITH A PROGAV 2.0 AND A M.BLUE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE AND DIFFICULT TO ADJUST. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 6 YEARS, HEIGHT: 136 CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: 38 KILOGRAMS (KG), GENDER: FEMALE. SAME EVENT AS MEDWATCH # 3004721439-2022-00303.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15547103 ↗InjuryOct 1, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MININAV (PART # FV660T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. THE REASON THE REVISION WAS PERFORMED WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 1 YEAR, HEIGHT: 75 CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: 10 KILOGRAMS (KG), GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15525462 ↗InjuryMay 21, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
InjuryMar 18, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO MIETHKE THAT A MININAV VALVE 10 (PART # FV660T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SURGEON SUSPECTED A SLOWER OUTFLOW. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021, AND THE VALVE WAS REPLACED. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION SURGERY. PATIENT INFORMATIONS: AGE: (B)(6), WEIGHT: (B)(6), HEIGHT: 50 CM, GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 11517486 ↗
Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices
- NATUS EDS3 DRAINAGE SYSTEM NT821731CNatus Medical Incorporated · Shunt, Central Nervous System And Components1 recall208 reports
- Exacta™ 46700Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 recall2 deaths163 reports
- Strata® 42866Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 death160 reports
- proGAV 2.0® FX410TChristoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · Shunt, central nervous system and components119 reports
- PROGAV 2.0 FX643TAesculap AG · Shunt, central nervous system and components100 reports
- Becker® 46128Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 recall50 reports
- M.BLUE PLUS FX804TAesculap AG · Shunt, central nervous system and components82 reports
- proSA® FV701TChristoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · Shunt, central nervous system and components82 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page