proGAV 2.0® FX414TRecalls & reported problems
Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 25 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of proGAV 2.0 (49)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This proGAV 2.0 adjustable shunt is implanted in the skull to drain fluid from the brain in patients with hydrocephalus. The 49 reports mostly describe drainage flow problems — fluid draining too fast or too slowly — along with difficulty adjusting the setting, and all 49 involved injuries. There were no deaths, and no recalls name this device. In the last 12 months no reports were filed, compared with 7 in the previous 12 months.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 49
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 49
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 49 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906136567), received between Nov 25, 2020 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 49 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (43 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Infusion or Flow Problem43
- Mechanical Problem23
- Physical Resistance/Sticking3
- Obstruction of Flow2
Patient problems
- Hydrocephalus49
- Spinal Arachnoiditis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 49 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 15, 2025Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 23277818 ↗InjuryAug 4, 2025Infusion or Flow Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Infusion or Flow Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTEMENT PROBLEMS. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 22698138 ↗InjuryMar 17, 2025Infusion or Flow Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Infusion or Flow Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2016. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 21618053 ↗InjuryFeb 24, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 21448124 ↗InjuryFeb 24, 2025Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 21446482 ↗InjuryJan 2, 2025Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 21054315 ↗InjuryDec 9, 2024Infusion or Flow Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Infusion or Flow Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM(#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 20877831 ↗InjuryOct 21, 2024Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM SHOWED AN OVER-DRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 20493461 ↗InjurySep 27, 2024Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 6 YEARS HEIGHT: 120 CM WEIGHT: 22 KG GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 20320796 ↗InjurySep 3, 2024Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 6 YEARS HEIGHT: 113 CM WEIGHT: 19 KG GENDER: MALE
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 20125400 ↗InjuryDec 18, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
NO FURTHER INFORMATION ABOUT ARTICLE OR INCIDENT AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 18345549 ↗InjuryAug 1, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SHOWED AN OVER-DRAINAGE AND ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 6 YEARS, WEIGHT: 15 KILOGRAMS (KG). HEIGHT: 112 CENTIMETERS (CM). GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 17438527 ↗InjuryJun 14, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SHOWED AN UNDER-DRAINAGE AND ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 6 YEARS WEIGHT: 14.5 KILOGRAMS (KG) HEIGHT: 105 CENTIMETERS (CM) GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 17131571 ↗InjuryMay 16, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (PART # FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SHOWED AN OVERDRAINAGE AND ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 8 YEARS. WEIGHT: 22 KILOGRAMS (KG). HEIGHT: 130 CENTIMETERS (CM). GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16943026 ↗InjuryMay 3, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDER-DRAINAGE PROBLEMS. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 5 YEARS. WEIGHT: 17 KILOGRAMS (KG). HEIGHT: UNKNOWN. GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16865389 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV® 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVER-DRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 13 YEARS WEIGHT: 30 KILOGRAMS (KG) HEIGHT: 125 CENTIMETERS (CM) GENDER: FEMALE SAME EVENT AS #3004721439-2023-00087.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16744498 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOEN DATE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 1 YEAR 8 MONTH, HEIGHT: 86 CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: 10 KILOGRAMS (KG), GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16742895 ↗InjuryApr 11, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVERDRAINAGE AND DIFFICULT TO ADJUST. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 7 YEARS. HEIGHT: 140 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 35 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16716797 ↗InjuryFeb 8, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDER-DRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 6 YEARS. HEIGHT: 113 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 20 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16330346 ↗InjuryDec 15, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 (PART #: FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 6 YEARS. HEIGHT: 110 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 15 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: MALE. SAME PATIENT/EVENT AS MEDWATCH#: 3004721439-2022-00377.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15988623 ↗InjurySep 29, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SHUNTASSISTANT (PART # FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 6 YEARS, 6 MONTHS, HEIGHT: 118 CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: 22 KILOGRAMS (KG), GENDER: FEMALE. SAME EVENT AS MEDWATCH# 3004721439-2022-00294.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15505882 ↗InjuryAug 30, 2022Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 10 YEARS, HEIGHT: 165 CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: 50 KILOGRAMS (KG), GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15324238 ↗InjuryAug 17, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 5 YEARS. HEIGHT: 110 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 18.3 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15245612 ↗InjuryJul 27, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (PART # FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVER- AND UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 9 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS. HEIGHT: 132 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 29.1 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15117313 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2022Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (PART # FX414T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2016. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVERDRAINAGE AND THE PROGAV 2.0 VALVE WAS NOT ADJUSTABLE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 10 YEARS. HEIGHT: 140 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 30 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15020972 ↗
Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices
- NATUS EDS3 DRAINAGE SYSTEM NT821731CNatus Medical Incorporated · Shunt, Central Nervous System And Components1 recall208 reports
- Exacta™ 46700Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 recall2 deaths163 reports
- Strata® 42866Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 death160 reports
- proGAV 2.0® FX410TChristoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · Shunt, central nervous system and components119 reports
- Becker® 46128Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 recall50 reports
- PROGAV 2.0 FX643TAesculap AG · Shunt, central nervous system and components100 reports
- proSA® FV701TChristoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · Shunt, central nervous system and components82 reports
- M.BLUE PLUS FX804TAesculap AG · Shunt, central nervous system and components82 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page