Skip to content

proGAV 2.0® FX418TRecalls & reported problems

Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · PROGAV 2.0 WITH SA10 AND DISTAL CATHETER · Class 2 · Implant

All models of proGAV 2.0 (49)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906136604), received between Jul 27, 2021 and Dec 23, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 2 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Infusion or Flow Problem2
  • Mechanical Problem2
  • No Flow1

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 23, 2025No Flow; No Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX418T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 23876315 ↗
  • InjuryMay 28, 2024Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX418T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A REVISION PROCEDURE (MEDWATCH# 3004721439-2024-00120) PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED TOGETHER WITH A SPRUNG RESERVOIR SET #FV046T (MEDWATCH # 3004721439-2024-00153). ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED A BLOCKAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ADDITIONAL REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 7 MONTHS HEIGHT: 64 CM WEIGHT: 9 KG GENDER: MALE SAME INCIDENT/PATIENT AS MEDWATCH# 3004721439-2024-00153.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 19405017 ↗
  • InjuryMay 16, 2024Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (# FX418T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE PROGAV 2.0 COULD NOT BE ADJUSTED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE COMPLAINANT'S DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION AS IT WAS DISPOSED OF AT THE HOSPITAL. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT DATA ARE KNOWN. SAME EVENT AS # 3004721439-2024-00119.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 19335118 ↗
  • InjuryJul 27, 2021Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 (#FX418T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVER-DRAINAGE AND TO HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE ADJUSTABILITY. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6) YEAR, HEIGHT: (B)(6), WEIGHT: (B)(6), GENDER: MALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12233144 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page