Skip to content

proGAV 2.0® FX442TRecalls & reported problems

Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA25 A.PRECHAMBER · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906137472), received between Apr 22, 2021 and Aug 27, 2024 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Mechanical Problem5
  • Infusion or Flow Problem3

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus7

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 27, 2024Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX442T) WAS IMPLANTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM SHOWED ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 8 YEARS, 1 MONTH. WEIGHT: 34 KG. HEIGHT: 124 CM. GENDER: FEMALE. SAME EVENT AS # 3004721439-2024-00266.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 20074699 ↗
  • InjurySep 12, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX442T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE AND ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 7 YEARS, 3 MONTHS. HEIGHT: 118 CENTIMETERS. WEIGHT: 16 KILOGRAMS. GENDER: FEMALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 17732045 ↗
  • InjuryNov 16, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FX442T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE CLOGGED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 5 YEARS, 11 MONTHS. HEIGHT: 109 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 17 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: MALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 15810487 ↗
  • InjuryNov 4, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT A PROGAV HAD A DYSFUNCTION POSTOPERATIVELY; THE ADJUSTMENT WOULD SPONTANEOUSLY CHANGE. THE PATIENT WAS ORIGINALLY IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2016. THE VALVE WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2017 AND RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. FURTHER DETAILS WERE NOT PROVIDED. HEIGHT: 130 CM.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12752497 ↗
  • InjurySep 30, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED MIETHKE THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA25 A.PRECHAMBER (PART # FX442T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS NOT ADJUSTABLE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2016. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6). WEIGHT: (B)(6). HEIGHT: 100 CENTIMETERS (CM). GENDER: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12558024 ↗
  • InjuryJun 2, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX442T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE NOT ADJUSTABLE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. PATIENT INFORMATIONS: AGE: (B)(6) HEIGHT: 120 CM WEIGHT: (B)(6) .

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 11921908 ↗
  • InjuryApr 22, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 (#FX442T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE IN 2017. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE BLOCKED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. PATIENT INFORMATION: AGE: (B)(6), WEIGHT: (B)(6), GENDER: MALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 11708900 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page