Skip to content

proGAV 2.0® FX448TRecalls & reported problems

Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA20 A.BURRHOLE RES · Class 2 · Implant

All models of proGAV 2.0 (49)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
12
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906137748), received between Oct 27, 2020 and Feb 10, 2026 — classified as 12 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (8 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Infusion or Flow Problem8
  • Mechanical Problem4
  • Obstruction of Flow1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus12

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 10, 2026Obstruction of Flow; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX448T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN UNDER-DRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS NOT YET SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 24303696 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2024Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX448T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2015. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM SHOWED AN ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 19644389 ↗
  • InjuryMay 12, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SUNT SYSTEM (#FX448T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 6 YEARS; HEIGHT: ~120 CENTIMETERS (CM); WEIGHT: ~18 KILOGRAMS (KG); GENDER: FEMALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 16924432 ↗
  • InjuryJun 14, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX448T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN ALTERNATION UNDERDRAINAGE AND OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. WEIGHT: 16 KG. GENDER: FEMALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 14691348 ↗
  • InjuryNov 30, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT A PROGAV WAS NOT ADJUSTABLE POSTOPERATIVELY. THE PATIENT WAS ORIGINALLY IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2016. THE VALVE WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2017 AND RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. FURTHER DETAILS WERE NOT PROVIDED. HEIGHT: 69 CM.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12892819 ↗
  • InjuryNov 18, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED MIETHKE THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA20 A.BURRHOLE RES (PART # FX448T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS NOT ADJUSTABLE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6). WEIGHT: (B)(6). HEIGHT: 120 CENTIMETERS (CM). GENDER: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12836435 ↗
  • InjuryNov 10, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED MIETHKE THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA20 A.BURRHOLE RES (PART # FX448T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN 2015. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATING IN UNDER-DRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2017. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6), WEIGHT: (B)(6) KILOGRAMS (KG), HEIGHT: 90 CENTIMETERS (CM), GENDER: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12791161 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2021Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX448T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATING IN UNDERDRAINAGE AND THE PROGAV 2.0 WAS NOT ABLE TO BE ADJUSTED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6), HEIGHT: (B)(6) CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: (B)(6) KILOGRAMS (KG), GENDER: MALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12363173 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    AGE: 31 YEARS. HEIGHT: 175 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 75 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: UNKNOWN. ADDITIONAL THE PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO HAVE A BLOCKAGE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 11849970 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    INVESTIGATION IS DONE ON 01/03/2021.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 11385777 ↗
  • InjuryOct 27, 2020Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    THE PRODUCT WAS RECEIVED ON 11/06/2020 FOR INVESTIGATION. ONLY THE PROGAV 2.0 VALVE WAS SEND IN. THE INVESTIGATION COULD BE PERFORMED. DATE OF IMPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2018. DATE OF REMOVAL: (B)(6) 2020.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 10743694 ↗
  • InjuryOct 27, 2020Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    THE PRODUCT WAS RECEIVED ON 11/06/2020 FOR INVESTIGATION. ONLY THE PROGAV 2.0 VALVE WAS SEND IN. THE INVESTIGATION COULD BE PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 10743676 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page