Skip to content

proGAV 2.0® FX449TRecalls & reported problems

Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · PROGAV 2.0 SYS PED.W/SA25 A.BURRHOLE RES · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906137755), received between Sep 16, 2021 and Apr 25, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Infusion or Flow Problem2
  • Mechanical Problem2

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 25, 2024Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SHUNTASSISTANT (#FX449T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN (B)(6) 2019.ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE SHOWED AN UNDER-DRAINAGE.THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024.THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.AGE: 20 YEARS. WEIGHT: 50 KGS.HEIGHT: 165 CM.GENDER: MALE.SAME EVENT AS # 3004721439-2024-00112.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 19180030 ↗
  • InjuryJan 11, 2024Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX449T) WAS UNABLE TO ADJUST THE PRESSURE OF THE VALVE DURING IMPLANTATION. THIS OCCURRED DURING SURGERY ON AN 8-MONTH-OLD INFANT. AFTER IMPLANTATION, THE VALVE SHOULD BE NORMALLY ADJUSTABLE, BUT IT WAS UNABLE TO CHANGE THE HIGH FLOW RATE. THIS IS EXTREMELY RARE - THE VALVE WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME TYPE. THE HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT HAD TO GET A NEW VALVE FROM THE OR'S STOCK AND REPLACE IT. THIS AFFECTED THE OPERATION TIME, WHICH WAS EXTENDED BY 5 MINUTES. FOR THE PATIENT, THIS MEANT AN EXTENSION OF THE OPERATION TIME, WHICH LED TO AN INCREASED RISK.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 18498168 ↗
  • InjurySep 16, 2021Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (PART # FX449T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE BLOCKED AND WAS DIFFICULT TO ADJUST. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6). HEIGHT: 100 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: (B)(6). GENDER: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12484744 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page