Skip to content

proSA® FV785TRecalls & reported problems

Christoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · PROSA W/ADJ.DP.UNIT AND PED.PRECHAMBER · Class 2 · Implant

All models of proSA (17)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906139841), received between May 10, 2021 and Sep 24, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Infusion or Flow Problem2
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 24, 2021Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED MIETHKE THAT A PROSA W/ADJ.DP.UNIT AND PED.PRECHAMBER (PART # FV785T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, A BLOCKAGE OF THE VALVE OCCURRED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2016. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6). WEIGHT: (B)(6). HEIGHT: (B)(6). GENDER: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12529363 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROSA SHUNTSYSTEM WITH PROGAV (#FV785T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019 . ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE VENTRICLE WERE DILATED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6) YEARS (BORN IN (B)(6)). HEIGHT: 180 CM. WEIGHT: 90 KG. GENDER: MALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 11802393 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page