Skip to content

GAV 2.0 FX211TRecalls & reported problems

Aesculap AG · GAV 2.0 VALVE 5/25 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of GAV 2.0 (16)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906500016), received between Mar 23, 2023 and Feb 18, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Infusion or Flow Problem2
  • Obstruction of Flow1

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 18, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A GAV 2.0 (#FX211T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THEVALVE CAUSED AN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 21397209 ↗
  • InjuryDec 28, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A GAV 2.0 VENTIL 10/25 (#FX214T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON UNKNOWN. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SHOWED A BLOCKAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON UNKNOWN. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS NOT YET RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 18409554 ↗
  • InjuryMar 23, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A GAV 2.0 (PART # FX211T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 16603430 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page