Skip to content

PROGAV 2.0 FX385TRecalls & reported problems

Aesculap AG · PROGAV 2.0 W/SA2.0 20 & SPRUNG RESERVOIR · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PROGAV 2.0 (43)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906502461), received between Feb 28, 2023 and Jun 15, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Calibration Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Calibration Problem1
  • Infusion or Flow Problem1
  • Mechanical Problem1
  • Obstruction of Flow1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus3
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 15, 2026Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX385T) WAS IMPLANTED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE PROGAV 2.0 VALVE HAD UNINTENDED SHUNT ADJUSTMENT. 4 YEARS AGO, THE PATIENT HAVE A PREVIOUSLY SELF- ADJUSTED VALVE, TOO. THE NEUROSURGEON SUSPECTED THAT THE PATIENT ADJUSTED THE SHUNT HIMSELF. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE AND A NEW SINGLE PRESSURE VALVE WAS IMPLANTED. THE SHUNT IS STILL IN TRANSIT TO MANUFACTURER FOR EXAMINATION.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 25505506 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 19, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Obstruction of Flow; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 21410548 ↗
  • InjuryMar 8, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FX385T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, APPROXIMATELY TWO (2) DAYS AFTER BEING IMPLANTED, THE VALVE SETTING WAS NOT ABLE TO BE REPROGRAMMED. THE SURGEON MADE SEVERAL UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS TO PERFORM THE ADJUSTMENT WITH THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE PRESENT. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS NOT YET BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 16507353 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 28, 2023Calibration Problem; Calibration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A PROGAV 2.0 W/SA2.0 20 & SPRUNG RESERVOIR (PART # FX385T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, APPROXIMATELY TWO (2) DAYS AFTER BEING IMPLANTED, THE VALVE SETTING WAS NOT ABLE TO BE REPROGRAMMED. THE SURGEON MADE SEVERAL UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS TO PERFORM THE ADJUSTMENT WITH THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE PRESENT. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS NOT YET BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 16453360 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page