PROGAV 2.0 FX577TRecalls & reported problems
Aesculap AG · PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 25 & SPRUNG RESERV. · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906502539), received between Apr 14, 2021 and Aug 25, 2025 — classified as 9 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Infusion or Flow Problem7
- Mechanical Problem3
- Obstruction of Flow1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- Hydrocephalus10
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 25, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Obstruction of Flow; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX577T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN UNDERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 22882445 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2024Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO CHANGE THE PRESSURE SETTING OF THE PROGAV 2.0 VALVE (#FX577T) BEFORE IMPLANTATION. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EXAMINATION TO THE MANUFACTURER.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 20030540 ↗InjuryFeb 2, 2024Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX577T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM SHOWED A BLOCKAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 21 YEARS. WEIGHT: 47 KILOGRAMS. HEIGHT: 162 CENTIMETERS. GENDER: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 18634365 ↗InjuryJun 20, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX577T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SHOWED AN UNDER-DRAINAGE THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 12 YEARS. WEIGHT: 40 KILOGRAMS (KG). HEIGHT: 148 CENTIMETERS (CM). GENDER: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 17167667 ↗InjuryMay 23, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX577T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM SHOWED AN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 68 YEARS. WEIGHT: 72 KILOGRAMS (KG). HEIGHT: 168 CENTIMETERS (CM). GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 16989399 ↗InjuryDec 9, 2022Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (PART # FX577T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE BLOCKED AND THE INTRAOPERATIVE MEASURED PRESSURE DID NOT CORRESPOND TO THE VALVE SETTING. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 40 YEARS. HEIGHT: 180 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 110 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15953517 ↗InjuryNov 4, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (PART # FX577T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN (B)(6) 2022. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 23 YEARS, HEIGHT: 195 CENTIMETERS (CM), WEIGHT: 95 KILOGRAMS (KG), GENDER: MALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 15730137 ↗InjuryMar 3, 2022Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (PART # FX577T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED IN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6). HEIGHT: 168 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: (B)(6) GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 13663123 ↗InjuryMay 19, 2021Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 25 & SPRUNG RESERV. (PART # FX577T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6), 2021. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE ADJUSTMENT WAS NOT POSSIBLE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6), 2021. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. IMPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2021. EXPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2021. AGE: (B)(6) WEIGHT: (B)(6) HEIGHT: 170 CENTIMETERS (CM). GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 11849096 ↗InjuryApr 14, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX577T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE CLOGGED /OPERATED IN UNDER-DRAINAGE. THE VENTRICLE SIZE IS NARROWED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. PATIENT INFORMATION: AGE: (B)(6) YEARS. HEIGHT: 175 CM. WEIGHT: (B)(6) KG. GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 11664325 ↗
Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices
- NATUS EDS3 DRAINAGE SYSTEM NT821731CNatus Medical Incorporated · Shunt, Central Nervous System And Components1 recall208 reports
- Exacta™ 46700Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 recall2 deaths163 reports
- Strata® 42866Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 death160 reports
- proGAV 2.0® FX410TChristoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · Shunt, central nervous system and components119 reports
- PROGAV 2.0 FX643TAesculap AG · Shunt, central nervous system and components100 reports
- Becker® 46128Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 recall50 reports
- M.BLUE PLUS FX804TAesculap AG · Shunt, central nervous system and components82 reports
- proSA® FV701TChristoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · Shunt, central nervous system and components82 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page