PROGAV 2.0 FX550TRecalls & reported problems
Aesculap AG · PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 15 & CONTROL RES. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of PROGAV 2.0 (43)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906503154), received between Mar 20, 2024 and Mar 18, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Physical Resistance/Sticking3
- Infusion or Flow Problem2
- Mechanical Problem2
Patient problems
- Hydrocephalus3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 18, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX551T) WHICH IS PART OF A SAMPLE ACCOUNT FROM AN US SALES REPRESENTATIVE HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS NO PATIENT WAS INVOLVED. THE COMPLAINED DEVICE WAS NOT YET RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24634549 ↗MalfunctionNov 4, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 (#FX550T) WAS WAS UNABLE TO PROGRAM PRIOR USE. THE INCIDENT CONTRIBUTE A DELAY OF THE SURGERY (5 MINUTES). NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WILL BE SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23463428 ↗MalfunctionOct 9, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX550T) HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES PREOPERATIVELY. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT IMPLANTED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATION WERE REPORTED. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WWILL BE RETURN TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 23254572 ↗InjuryMar 20, 2024Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 15 & CONTROL RES. (PART # FX550T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT THE SHUNT SETTING WAS AT 10. REPORTEDLY THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SHUNT STUDY ON (B)(6) 2023 THAT WAS REPORTED TO BE SUCCESSFUL. DURING THIS TIME THE PATIENT ALSO UNDERWENT A CERVICAL SPINE MRI ON (B)(6) 2023 AND A BRAIN MRI ON (B)(6) 2023. THE PATIENT WENT TO AN OUTSIDE HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2023 WITH HEADACHES WHERE THE SHUNT WAS CHECKED AND REPORTED TO BE AT A SETTING OF 2. THIS WAS THEN CHANGED BACK TO 10. ON (B)(6) 2024 THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE ORIGINAL CLINIC DUE TOT HIGH PRESSURE SYMPTOMS. AN X-RAY WAS PERFORMED AND THE VALVE WAS FOUND TO BE SET AT 9. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024 TO A DEVICE FROM ANOTHER SUPPLIER. TESTING IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO REMOVAL REVEALED THE SHUNT TO BE SET AT 10 WITH THE PROGRAMMER DEVICE. NO ATTEMPTS TO CHANGE THE SHUNT WERE MADE. THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER AIC REFERENCE (B)(4).
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 18939506 ↗InjuryMar 20, 2024Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 (#FX550T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE SHOWED AN OVER-DRAINAGE AND ADJUSTMENT PROBLEMS. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 34 YEARS, 6 MONTHS. WEIGHT: 87 KG. HEIGHT: 170 CM. GENDER: FEMALE.
Patient problems: Hydrocephalus
MAUDE report 18939504 ↗
Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices
- NATUS EDS3 DRAINAGE SYSTEM NT821731CNatus Medical Incorporated · Shunt, Central Nervous System And Components1 recall208 reports
- Exacta™ 46700Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 recall2 deaths163 reports
- Strata® 42866Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 death160 reports
- proGAV 2.0® FX410TChristoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · Shunt, central nervous system and components119 reports
- Becker® 46128Medtronic Ps Medical, Inc. · Shunt, central nervous system and components1 recall50 reports
- PROGAV 2.0 FX643TAesculap AG · Shunt, central nervous system and components100 reports
- proSA® FV701TChristoph Miethke GmbH & Co. KG · Shunt, central nervous system and components82 reports
- M.BLUE PLUS FX804TAesculap AG · Shunt, central nervous system and components82 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page