Skip to content

PROGAV 2.0 FX571TRecalls & reported problems

Aesculap AG · PROGAV 2.0 SYS SA2.0 25 & PED.BURRH.RES. · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
16
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
16
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 16 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04041906503987), received between Feb 18, 2021 and May 12, 2026 — classified as 16 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Infusion or Flow Problem” (10 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Infusion or Flow Problem10
  • Obstruction of Flow4
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking4
  • Mechanical Problem3
  • Excess Flow or Over-Infusion1
  • Insufficient Flow or Under Infusion1

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus16

Recent adverse event reports

The 16 most recent of 16 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 12, 2026Obstruction of Flow; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2025. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN UNDERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 25147925 ↗
  • InjuryMar 16, 2026Obstruction of Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN UNDER-DRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 24604064 ↗
  • InjuryMar 2, 2026Infusion or Flow Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 24482333 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Obstruction of Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNTSYSTEM 2.0 (#FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN 2024. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 23501442 ↗
  • InjuryJul 21, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Obstruction of Flow; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (# FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN UNDERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 22554117 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2025Infusion or Flow Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Infusion or Flow Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNT SYSTEM (#FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE AND HAD ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINED PRODUCT WAS SENT TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 22283365 ↗
  • InjuryNov 27, 2024Excess Flow or Over-Infusion; Insufficient Flow or Under Infusion; Excess Flow or Over-Infusion; Insufficient Flow or Under Infusion

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 (#FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE SHOWED AN UNDER- AND OVER-DRAINAGE AND ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. SAME EVENT AS # 3004721439-2024-00362 / 400684952.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 20800291 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 (#FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE CAUSED AN UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE:9 MONTHS HEIGHT: 60 - 70 CM WEIGHT: 4 KG GENDER: FEMALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 18314381 ↗
  • InjuryOct 27, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SHOWED A UNDER-DRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 30 MONTHS, WEIGHT: 6 KILOGRAMS, HEIGHT: 60 CENTIMETERS, GENDER: FEMALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 18025014 ↗
  • InjuryOct 10, 2023Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (#FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM CAUSED AN OVERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 14 YEARS. HEIGHT: 140 CENTIMETERS. WEIGHT: 40 KILOGRAMS. GENDER: FEMALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 17907303 ↗
  • InjuryJul 12, 2023Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (PART#: FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SHOWED AN OVER-DRAINAGE AN ADJUSTMENT DIFFICULTIES. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 6 YEARS, WEIGHT: 9.5 KILOGRAMS (KG), HEIGHT: 90 CENTIMETERS (CM), GENDER: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 17312613 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 16, 2023Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 (PART # FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE DIFFICULT TO ADJUST. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: 2 YEARS. HEIGHT: 70 CENTIMETERS (CM). WEIGHT: 11.2 KILOGRAMS (KG). GENDER: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 16390272 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV SHUNTSYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNT SYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO HAVE A BLOCKAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6). HEIGHT: 90 CM. WEIGHT: (B)(6).

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 12355610 ↗
  • InjuryMay 18, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE VALVE WAS BELIEVED TO BE OPERATED UNDERDRAINAGE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINANT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. IMPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2021. EXPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2021. AGE: (B)(6) MONTH. WEIGHT: (B)(6) 8 KG. GENDER: MALE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 11844943 ↗
  • InjuryMay 5, 2021Infusion or Flow Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROGAV 2.0 SHUNTSYSTEM (PART # FX571T) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PRIMARY PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE SHUNTSYSTEM WAS BELIEVED TO BE CLOGGED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. AGE: (B)(6) YEARS. WEIGHT: 13 KILOGRAMS (KG). HEIGHT: 90 CENTIMETERS (CM).

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 11780545 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 18, 2021Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem; Mechanical Problem; Infusion or Flow Problem

    THE INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED ON 02/18/2021.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 11342149 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.