Skip to content

AS Columbus® REVISION F NR071ZRecalls & reported problems

Aesculap AG · AS COLUMBUS REV F TIB.OFFSET CEMENT.T1 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AS Columbus REVISION F (10)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04046963175948), received between Oct 11, 2021 and Aug 28, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Appears to Trigger Rejection” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection2
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility2

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Implant Pain1
  • Metal Related Pathology1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 28, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A LEFT TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 22913044 ↗
  • InjuryApr 2, 2025Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT AN AS COLUMBUS REV F TIB.OFFSET CEMENT.T1 (PART# NR071Z) WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT A SURGERY TO REPLACE THE POLYETHYLENE COMPONENTS HAD BEEN PLANNED FOR (B)(6) 2025; SIZES LARGER THAN 20 MILLIMETER (MM) NEEDED. THE PROCEDURE WOULD BE REVISION RIGHT KNEE TOTAL ARTHROPLASTY (TKA). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED BUT HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER AIC REFERENCE (B)(4). ASSOCIATED MEDWATCH REPORTS: 3005673311-2025-00019, 3005673311-2025-00020, 3005673311-2025-00022, 3005673311-2025-00023, 3005673311-2025-00024, 3005673311-2025-00025, 3005673311-2025-00026, 3005673311-2025-00027, 3005673311-2025-00028, 3005673311-2025-00029, 3005673311-2025-00030.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 21755137 ↗
  • InjuryMay 20, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP AG THAT A AS TIBIA OFFSET STEM D12X52MM CEMENTED. (PART # NR191Z) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A LEFT KNEE REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, POST-OPERATIVE BONE DETERIORATION OF FEMUR AND TIBIA OCCURRED. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. AN ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. A REVISION IN THE FUTURE IS LIKELY, ACCORDING TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE MALFUNCTION IS FILED UNDER AAG REFERENCE (B)(4). ASSOCIATED MEDWATCH REPORTS: (B)(4) - NR191Z (9610612-2022-00142); (B)(4) - NR291Z (9610612-2022-00143); (B)(4) - NR565Z (9610612-2022-00144); (B)(4) - NR565Z (9610612-2022-00145); (B)(4) - NR611M (9610612-2022-00146); (B)(4) - NR005Z (9610612-2022-00148); (B)(4)- NR400Z (9610612-2022-00149).

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 14456572 ↗
  • InjuryMay 20, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A AS COLUMBUS REV F TIB. OFFSET CEMENT. T1 (PART # NR071Z) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A LEFT KNEE REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, POST-OPERATIVE BONE DETERIORATION OF FEMUR AND TIBIA OCCURRED. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. AN ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. ACCORDING TO THE PATIENT , A REVISION SURGERY IN THE FUTURE IS LIKELY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE MALFUNCTION IS FILED UNDER AIC REFERENCE (B)(4). ASSOCIATED MEDWATCH REPORTS: 400554585: NR191Z, (2916714-2022-00055), 400554586: NR291Z, (2916714-2022-00056), 400554587: NR565Z, (2916714-2022-00057), 400554588: NR565Z, (2916714-2022-00058), 400554589: NR611M, (2916714-2022-00059), 400554591: NR005Z, (2916714-2022-00061), 400554592: NR400Z, (2916714-2022-00062).

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 14456074 ↗
  • InjuryOct 11, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A COLUMBUS REV F TIB.OFFSET CEMENT.T1 (PART # NR071Z-AS) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE CEMENTING PROCESS OF THE TIBIA TRAY AND STEM, THE CEMENT WORKED ITS WAY INTO THE TIBIA BASEPLATE. THE CEMENT ENTERED THE TIBIA TRAY AT THE JUNCTION OF THE INFERIOR SIDE OF THE TIBIA TRAY. THE CEMENT OBSTRUCTED THE THREADED SCREW HOLE FOR THE TIBIAL INSERT SCREW. REPORTEDLY, THE SURGEON SPENT EXTRA TIME REMOVING THE HARDENED CEMENT FROM THE SMALL SCREW HOLE BEFORE THE SCREW WAS ABLE TO BE PLACED. HOWEVER, THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO CLEAR THE CEMENT AND INSERT THE SCREW, AND THEN THE PROCEDURE WAS ABLE TO BE CONTINUED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. ALTHOUGH REQUESTED, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN MADE AVAILABLE. THE ADVERSE EVENT / MALFUNCTION IS FILED UNDER AIC REFERENCE (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12610661 ↗
  • InjuryOct 11, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A COLUMBUS REV F TIB.OFFSET CEMENT.T1 (PART # NR071Z-AS) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE CEMENTING PROCESS OF THE TIBIA TRAY AND STEM, THE CEMENT WORKED ITS WAY INTO THE TIBIA BASEPLATE. THE CEMENT ENTERED THE TIBIA TRAY AT THE JUNCTION OF THE INFERIOR SIDE OF TIBIA TRAY. THE CEMENT OBSTRUCTED THE THREADED SCREW HOLE FOR THE TIBIAL INSERT SCREW. REPORTEDLY, THE SURGEON SPENT EXTRA TIME REMOVING THE HARDENED CEMENT FROM THE SMALL SCREW HOLE BEFORE THE SCREW WAS ABLE TO BE PLACED. HOWEVER, THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO CLEAR THE CEMENT AND INSERT THE SCREW. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. ALTHOUGH REQUESTED, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN MADE AVAILABLE. THE ADVERSE EVENT / MALFUNCTION IS FILED UNDER AAG REFERENCE (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12605085 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page