Skip to content

VEGA System® PS NX110Recalls & reported problems

Aesculap AG · VEGA PS GLIDING SURFACE T1/1+ 10MM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of VEGA System PS (31)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04046963810764), received between Mar 19, 2021 and Jun 8, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2
  • Discomfort1
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 8, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility

    AN OUTSIDE LAW FIRM REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED COMPLICATIONS WITH AN AESCULAP KNEE IMPLANT. REPORTEDLY THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS "GROSSLY LOOSE" AND "REMOVED BY HAND". THE TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS ALSO "GROSSLY LOOSE" AND "LIFTED OUT OF THE CEMENT MANTLE" THE CEMENT MANTLE REMAINED ADHERED TO THE BONES AND HAD TO BE EXTRACTED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT NOT YET PROVIDED. THIS REPORT IS FILED UNDER AIS REFERENCE (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 25431191 ↗
  • InjuryMar 24, 2021Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH A VEGA PS GLIDING SURFACE T1/1+ 10MM (PART # NX110) AND A VEGA PS TIBIAL PLATEAU CEMENTED T1 (PART # NX051) WERE USED DURING A TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE PATIENT FELT DISCOMFORT IN KNEES ON (B)(6) 2021. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT RECEIVED AN X-RAY AND FOUND THAT THE INSERT FIXING SCREW HAD COME OFF. REPORTEDLY, THE SCREW HAD BEEN FLOATING SINCE (B)(6) OF 2020, BUT THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT AWARE AT THAT TIME. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED WHICH REVEALED THAT THERE WAS NO DAMAGE FOUND ON THE REMOVED INSERTS AND SCREWS. IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED THAT THE SCRATCHES ON THE FRONT OF THE INSERT ARE THOSE AT THE TIME OF REMOVAL AND ARE NOT SCRATCHED OR DAMAGED BEFORE REMOVAL. NO PATIENT ADVERSE EFFECTS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION SURGERY. ALTHOUGH REQUESTED, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAD NOT BEEN MADE AVAILABLE. THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER AAG REFERENCE (B)(4). ASSOCIATED MEDWATCH-REPORTS: 9610612-2021-00196 (400504528 + NX110), 9610612-202

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11564158 ↗
  • InjuryMar 19, 2021Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A VEGA KNEE IMPLANT SYSTEM WAS IMPLANTED DURING A PRIMARY SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2015. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, FOLLOWING THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED LOOSENING OF THE IMPLANT. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2017. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS NOT AVAILABLE TO BE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AT THIS TIME, IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE THE COMPLAINT WILL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. THE ADVERSE EVENT / MALFUNCTION IS FILED UNDER REFERENCE XC (B)(4). INVOLVED COMPONENTS: NX009Z (PS FEMUR CEMENTED F4N LT), NX043 (UNIVERSAL PATELLA P3), NX110 (PS PE INSERT T1/T1+, 10MM), NN260P (PEEK PLUG F/ TIBIA), NX051Z (PS TIBIA CEMENTED T1). THE CEMENT USED IS UNIDENTIFIED. ASSOCIATED MEDWATCHES: 2916714-2020-00329, 2916714-2020-00330, 2916714-2020-00331, 2916714-2020-00332, 2916714-2020-00333.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 11527805 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page