Skip to content

Columbus® REVISION F NR124MRecalls & reported problems

Aesculap AG · COLUMBUS REV F MC GLID.SURF.T2/2+ 18MM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Columbus REVISION F (14)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04046964009464), received between Jan 13, 2023 and Oct 29, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
  • Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2
  • Joint Dislocation2
  • Implant Pain1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 29, 2024Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A COLUMBUS REV F MC GLID.SURF.T2/2+ 18MM (PART # NR124M) WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT THE PATIENT WAS INFECTED AND REQUIRED A REVISION PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY THE REVISION WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION. THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER AIC REFERENCE (B)(4). ASSOCIATED MEDWATCH REPORTS: 2916714-2024-00162 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)). 2916714-2024-00165 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)). 2916714-2024-00166 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)). 2916714-2024-00167 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)). 2916714-2024-00168 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)). 2916714-2024-00169 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)). 2916714-2024-00171 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)). 2916714-2024-00172 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)). 2916714-2024-00173 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)). 2916714-2024-00174 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)). 2916714-2024-00175 (AIC REFERENCE NO. (B)(4)).

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Implant Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20557888 ↗
  • InjuryJan 17, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED TO AESCULAP INC. THAT A COLUMBUS REV F MC GLID.SURF.T2/2+ 18MM (PART # NR124M) WAS IMPLANTED DURING A TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (TKA) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON AN UNSPECIFIED DATE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE KNEE IMPLANT DISLOCATED POSTOPERATIVELY ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2022. REPORTEDLY, THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH A SIMILAR IMPLANT. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS NOT AVAILABLE TO BE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE REVISION PROCEDURE. THE ADVERSE EVENT/MALFUNCTION IS FILED UNDER AIC REFERENCE (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 16183483 ↗
  • InjuryJan 13, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH NR124M - COLUMBUS REV F MC GLID.SURF.T2/2+ 18MM. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION, THE JOINT DISLOCATED POSTOPERATIVELY ON (B)(6) 2022. A CLOSED REDUCTION WAS PLANNED AND PERFORMED ON 20DEC2022; THE T2 18 MC MM POLY WAS REPLACED WITH T2 20MM HC POLY. A REVISION WAS NECESSARY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE ADVERSE EVENT IS FILED UNDER AAG REFERENCE (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 16160898 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page