Skip to content

obelisc™ vertebral body replacement CS 2920-32Recalls & reported problems

Ulrich GmbH & Co. KG · obelisc center piece, ø 20 mm, height 32-47 mm two variable end pieces · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04052536005598), received between Mar 29, 2019 and Feb 22, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Connection Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Connection Problem2
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2
  • Discomfort1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 22, 2021Connection Problem; Connection Problem

    THE USER HAD DIFFICULTY ATTACHING THE LEFT SIDE OF THE OBELISC END PIECE TO THE CENTER CAGE. THIS RESULTED IN AN APPROXIMATELY 1.5 HOURS OF ADDITIONAL OPERATING TIME.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11358200 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 22, 2021Connection Problem; Connection Problem

    THE USER HAD DIFFICULTY ATTACHING THE LEFT SIDE OF THE OBELISC END PIECE TO THE CENTER CAGE. THIS RESULTED IN AN APPROXIMATELY 1.5 HOURS OF ADDITIONAL OPERATING TIME.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11358189 ↗
  • InjuryMar 29, 2019Fracture; Fracture

    IMPLANT FAILURE AFTER SPONDYLODESIS AFTER LWK2 ON LWK4 WITH SECONDARY DISLOCATION OF THE INSERTED OBELISC PRO CAGE AFTER LWK3 FRACTURE. A PIECE OF THE OBELISC CAGE BROKE OFF AND THE CAGE WAS REMOVED IN A REVISION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Pain

    MAUDE report 8465476 ↗

Other SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE devices

All SPINAL VERTEBRAL BODY REPLACEMENT DEVICE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page