Tumark® Vision for Eviva® Standard Tumark-E13-S-VisionRecalls & reported problems
SOMATEX Medical Technologies GmbH · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04250195611222), received between Dec 22, 2025 and May 1, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Patient Device Interaction Problem1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Inflammation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 1, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
HOLOGIC HAS RECEIVED CORRESPONDENCE ARISING FROM LITIGATION. THE LITIGATION ALLEGES THAT A PATIENT RECEIVED A TUMARK VISION FOR EVIVA STANDARD BREAST MARKER ON (B)(6) 2021. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT THE PATIENT DEVELOPED A "SEVERE INFLAMMATORY REACTION," AND THE DEVICE WAS SURGICALLY REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2025. ADDITIONALLY, IT IS REPORTED THAT DIAGNOSIS OF THE EXCISED TISSUE CONFIRMED THE PRESENCE OF "FOREIGN BODY GRANULOMA."
Patient problems: Inflammation
MAUDE report 25057175 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN VACUUM ASSISTED EXCISION OF A B3 LESION ON (B)(6) 2025, THE LESION CONTAINED A TUMARK ¨VISION¨BREAST MARKER. THE VACUUM ASSISTED EXCISION WAS PERFORMED USING A 7G BD ENCORE DEVICE. THE FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE MARKER WAS DAMAGED DURING THE PROCEDURE AND SEVERAL SMALL FRAGMENTS WERE LODGED WITHIN THE SURROUNDING BREAST TISSUE. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23865831 ↗
Other Marker, Radiographic, Implantable devices
- BioZorb F0202Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls192 reports
- BioZorb F0221Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE3 recalls15 reports
- BioZorb F0203Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls51 reports
- BioZorb F0231Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls19 reports
- BioZorb F0303Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls19 reports
- BioZorb F0304Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls19 reports
- BioZorb F0404Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls6 reports
- BioZorb F0331Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page