Skip to content

EIT TLIF cage TUI81032Recalls & reported problems

EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · EIT TLIF, H 10mm, 8°, 32/12 · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04260557776582), received between Jun 25, 2026 and Jun 25, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 25, 2026Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS WAS AN UNKNOWN SURGERY PERFORMED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. WHEN THE DEVICE IN QUESTION WAS INSERTED INTO THE INTERVERTEBRAL SPACE, AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO POSITION IT ANTERIOR TO THE VERTEBRAL BODY. HOWEVER, THE DEVICE ADVANCED BEYOND THE INTENDED POSITION AND PROTRUDED ANTERIORLY FROM THE VERTEBRAL BODY. THE POSITIONING WAS ATTEMPTED MULTIPLE TIMES, BUT THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE PLACED AT THE INTENDED LOCATION AND THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING AN ALTERNATIVE DEVICE WITHOUT ISSUES. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT ANY SURGICAL DELAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25619265 ↗

Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices

All Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.