EIT TLIF cage TUI81232Recalls & reported problems
EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · EIT TLIF, H 12mm, 8°, 32/12 · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04260557776605), received between Oct 21, 2020 and Oct 21, 2020 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
Patient problems
- Not Applicable1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 21, 2020Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2020, THE SURGEON HAD TO ABANDON USING THE CAGE AND INSERTION INSTRUMENTS BECAUSE OF THEIR INABILITY TO MAINTAIN A STRAIGHT LINE. THE THREAD THAT CONNECTED THE SILVER HANDLE TO THE TIGHTENING DEVICE FOR THE CAGE WAS WORN AND WAS A WEAK POINT IN THE INSERTION DEVICE MECHANISM. THE RATCHETED OR TENSION ATTACHMENT FOR THE CAGE CAUSED A DANGEROUS MISALIGNMENT OF THE BANANA CAGE DURING INSERTION. ONCE THE CAGE HAD BEEN ATTACHED TO THE INSERTION DEVICE IN THE CORRECT FASHION THE SURGEON SHOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO INSERT IT IN A DIRECT LINE WITH THE INSTRUMENT. THE ATTACHMENT OF THE CAGE WAS NOT ABLE TO HOLD THE STRAIGHT ALIGNMENT ,AND UPON INSERTION THE CAGE FLEXED AND WENT INTO THE SPINAL CANAL. IT IS CRUCIAL ESPECIALLY FOR MIS THAT THE CAGE BE ABLE TO BE INSERTED IN THE EXACT LINE THAT THE SURGEON PLACED IT IN. ONCE IN THE CORRECT POSITION OF THE DISC SPACE IT CAN RELEASE THE TENSION, THE HANDLE CAN MOVE MEDIALLY AND CAN GET IN THE DESIRED POSITION. WEAR OF THE INSERTION DEVICE CREATED AN UNSAFE SITUATION FOR THE PATIENT. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF SIXTY (60) MINUTES. ANOTHER CAGE AND INSE
Patient problems: Not Applicable
MAUDE report 10712257 ↗
Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page