Secur-Fit J6051-0625Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Cementless Hip Stem · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Secur-Fit (45)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540002891), received between Aug 5, 2019 and Sep 14, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination /Decontamination Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
- Degraded1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Loss of Osseointegration1
Patient problems
- Injury1
- Osteolysis1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 14, 2021Degraded; Loss of Osseointegration; Degraded; Loss of Osseointegration
PREOPERATIVE CT SHOWED HALOS AS IF THE CERAMIC LINER WAS CRACKED. IT WAS REMOVED AND CHECKED, BUT IT WAS NOT CRACKED. SINCE THE OSTEOSTEOLYSIS IN THE PROXIMAL FEMUR WAS LARGE EVEN THOUGH IT WAS CERAMIC ON CERAMIC, SURGEON ASKED TO INVESTIGATE IF THERE WAS ANY INVISIBLE WEAR.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 12467157 ↗InjuryAug 5, 2019Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE THA WAS DONE AT (B)(6) 2011. AFTER THAT, THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF PAIN AND MELTING OF BONE WAS RECOGNIZED AT THE X-P. THEREFORE, REVISION SURGERY WAS DONE FOR ALL LEFT HIP IMPLANT . THE BLACK FOREIGN BODY WAS RECOGNIZED JUST BELOW THE FITTING PORTION OF THE HEAD AND STEM.
Patient problems: Injury; Pain
MAUDE report 8860010 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page