Skip to content

Omnifit 2041-2854Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 10degrees Series II Insert · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Omnifit (43)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540035394), received between Nov 4, 2020 and May 29, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn2
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 29, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO ECENTRIC WEAR OF THE LINER. A HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE WAS PERFORMED. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22108596 ↗
  • InjuryJan 12, 2021Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    AS REPORTED: "PATIENTS RIGHT HIP: HEAD, CUP AND LINER WERE REVIVED DUE TO POLY WEAR." A SECUR-FIT HA SHELL, C-TAPER CERAMIC HEAD, AND OMNIFIT 10° INSERT WERE REVISED. PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A TRITANIUM CONSTRUCT WITH MDM LINER.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 11153265 ↗
  • InjuryNov 4, 2020Unstable; Unstable

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO INSTABILITY. AN OSTEONICS MORSE TAPER HEAD AND 10° OSTEONICS INSERT WERE REVISED TO A CONSTRAINED LINER AND NEW FEMORAL HEAD. REP PROVIDED A PORTION OF THE PRIMARY USAGE SHEET AND CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 10783636 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page