EXETER 0939-0-116Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 2.5 I M PLUG · Class 2 · Implant
All models of EXETER (36)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540167248), received between Jan 30, 2017 and Jan 30, 2017 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K173499, K191414, K980843); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Fracture2
- Material Integrity Problem2
Patient problems
- No Information2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 30, 2017Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem
STRYKER SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT 2 CEMENT RESTRICTORS BROKE DURING INSERTION. THE FIRST TIME THE RESTRICTOR SPLIT, THE SURGEON HAD TO MANUALLY REMOVE EACH OF THE PIECES. THESE WERE SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE SECOND TIME, ON ADVICE FROM SENIOR SURGEON, HE OPTED TO LEAVE THE RESTRICTOR IN. THE TOP BROKE OFF THIS PARTICULAR ONE BUT IT WAS SO WELL FIXED IT WAS PROVING DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. TWO DIFFERENT INTRODUCERS WERE USED. THESE HAVE BEEN USED WITHOUT ISSUE IN PREVIOUS SURGERIES.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6287305 ↗MalfunctionJan 30, 2017Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem
THE STRYKER SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT 2 CEMENT RESTRICTORS BROKE DURING INSERTION. THE FIRST TIME THE RESTRICTOR SPLIT, THE SURGEON HAD TO MANUALLY REMOVE EACH OF THE PIECES. THESE WERE SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE SECOND TIME, ON ADVICE FROM SENIOR SURGEON, HE OPTED TO LEAVE THE RESTRICTOR IN. THE TOP BROKE OFF THIS PARTICULAR ONE BUT IT WAS SO WELL FIXED IT WAS PROVING DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. TWO DIFFERENT INTRODUCERS WERE USED. THESE HAVE BEEN USED WITHOUT ISSUE IN PREVIOUS SURGERIES
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Information
MAUDE report 6287297 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K173499, K191414, K980843. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0313-2022 · Oct 15, 2021 · Open, Classified28MM -4 LFIT V40 HEAD, Catalog Number 6260-9-028
- Z-0314-2022 · Oct 15, 2021 · Open, Classified28MM -4 LFIT V40 HEAD, Catalog Number 6260-9-122
Other CEMENT OBTURATOR devices
- BIOSTOP 5463-12-000Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · CEMENT OBTURATOR1 recall6 reports
- BIOSTOP 5463-08-000Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · CEMENT OBTURATOR1 recall1 report
- BIOSTOP 5463-16-000Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · CEMENT OBTURATOR1 recall1 report
- BIOSTOP 5463-18-000Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · CEMENT OBTURATOR1 recall1 report
- ACM BioPrep 0306705000Stryker Corporation · CEMENT OBTURATOR1 recall0 reports
- NA 0306703000Stryker Corporation · CEMENT OBTURATOR1 recall0 reports
- BIOSTOP 5463-20-000Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · CEMENT OBTURATOR1 recall0 reports
- PREP-IM 121010Smith & Nephew, Inc. · CEMENT OBTURATOR10 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page