Trident 540-11-52ERecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Solid Back Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Trident (160)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540237835), received between Sep 14, 2018 and Apr 15, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Degraded1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Noise, Audible1
Patient problems
- Injury2
- Insufficient Information2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Fall1
- Foreign Body Reaction1
- Loss of Range of Motion1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 15, 2026Noise, Audible
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: PATIENT REPORTED SQUEAKING WHEN MOVING HIP. PATIENT SENT FOR X-RAY AND SCANS FOR IMPLANT PLANNING. SURGEON SCHEDULES PATIENT FOR REVISION SURGERY TO REPLACE/REPOSITION CUP. OLD CUP, LINER AND FEMORAL HEADS REMOVED. HEAVY WEAR NOTED ON FEMORAL HEAD AND LINER. ALL COMPONENTS IN SITU (EXCEPT STEM) ARE REPLACED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24885752 ↗InjuryMar 12, 2024Degraded; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Degraded; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
RIGHT HIP REVISION PROCEDURE. CAUSE OF REVISION WAS PSEUDOTUMOUR. ALL PRIMARY IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY A PROXIMAL FEMUR GMRS, CEMENTED CONSTRAINED LINER AND ACETABULAR CAGE OF COMPETITOR PRODUCT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18891631 ↗InjuryJun 28, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED AFTER PATIENT COMPLAINT OF GROIN PAIN AND LIMITED ROM. A SHELL, LINER, AND FEMORAL HEAD WERE REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THAT NOTHING WAS NOTED TO BE BROKEN OR LOOSE INTRA-OPERATIVELY, AND THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.
Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Pain
MAUDE report 17222204 ↗InjuryJun 7, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED. APPROXIMATELY 8 WEEKS PRIOR TO REVISION, PATIENT FELL AND SUSTAINED AN ACETABULAR FRACTURE. SURGEON DECIDED TO LET THE FRACTURE HEAL, THEN REVISED THE PATIENT'S SHELL, LINER, AND HEAD. REP CONFIRMED THAT THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED HEAD AND LINER.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Fall
MAUDE report 14617287 ↗InjuryJun 29, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Insufficient Device Problem Information
LOOSE ACCOLADE TMZF FEMORAL STEM WITH MIS POSITIONED ACETABULAR LINER WITH ALUMINA CERAMIC IN CERAMIC BEARING. CORRECTION 15/JUNE/2020 WG: SPOKE TO REP. THE SHELL WAS MALPOSITIONED, NOT THE ALUMINA LINER.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Injury
MAUDE report 10206333 ↗InjurySep 14, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
LINER DISLOCATION AFTER ONE MONTH OF IMPLANTATION. THE LINER WAS REVISED. UPDATE FROM REP: LINER DISLOCATED FROM SHELL.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 7876477 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices
- Novation 134-36-45Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-28-650Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer89 reports
- Trident 690-00-28FHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall37 reports
- Trident 690-00-22EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall36 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-652Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer75 reports
- Trident 690-00-22DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall22 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-654Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer70 reports
- Trident 69-2850Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall11 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page