Skip to content

Trident 540-11-52ERecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Solid Back Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident (160)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540237835), received between Sep 14, 2018 and Apr 15, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Degraded1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Noise, Audible1

Patient problems

  • Injury2
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Fall1
  • Foreign Body Reaction1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 15, 2026Noise, Audible

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: PATIENT REPORTED SQUEAKING WHEN MOVING HIP. PATIENT SENT FOR X-RAY AND SCANS FOR IMPLANT PLANNING. SURGEON SCHEDULES PATIENT FOR REVISION SURGERY TO REPLACE/REPOSITION CUP. OLD CUP, LINER AND FEMORAL HEADS REMOVED. HEAVY WEAR NOTED ON FEMORAL HEAD AND LINER. ALL COMPONENTS IN SITU (EXCEPT STEM) ARE REPLACED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24885752 ↗
  • InjuryMar 12, 2024Degraded; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Degraded; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    RIGHT HIP REVISION PROCEDURE. CAUSE OF REVISION WAS PSEUDOTUMOUR. ALL PRIMARY IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY A PROXIMAL FEMUR GMRS, CEMENTED CONSTRAINED LINER AND ACETABULAR CAGE OF COMPETITOR PRODUCT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18891631 ↗
  • InjuryJun 28, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED AFTER PATIENT COMPLAINT OF GROIN PAIN AND LIMITED ROM. A SHELL, LINER, AND FEMORAL HEAD WERE REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THAT NOTHING WAS NOTED TO BE BROKEN OR LOOSE INTRA-OPERATIVELY, AND THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Pain

    MAUDE report 17222204 ↗
  • InjuryJun 7, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED. APPROXIMATELY 8 WEEKS PRIOR TO REVISION, PATIENT FELL AND SUSTAINED AN ACETABULAR FRACTURE. SURGEON DECIDED TO LET THE FRACTURE HEAL, THEN REVISED THE PATIENT'S SHELL, LINER, AND HEAD. REP CONFIRMED THAT THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED HEAD AND LINER.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Fall

    MAUDE report 14617287 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    LOOSE ACCOLADE TMZF FEMORAL STEM WITH MIS POSITIONED ACETABULAR LINER WITH ALUMINA CERAMIC IN CERAMIC BEARING. CORRECTION 15/JUNE/2020 WG: SPOKE TO REP. THE SHELL WAS MALPOSITIONED, NOT THE ALUMINA LINER.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Injury

    MAUDE report 10206333 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    LINER DISLOCATION AFTER ONE MONTH OF IMPLANTATION. THE LINER WAS REVISED. UPDATE FROM REP: LINER DISLOCATED FROM SHELL.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 7876477 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices

All Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page