Skip to content

Trident 542-11-62HRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Cluster Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident (160)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540240545), received between Dec 27, 2017 and Oct 19, 2022 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Injury3
  • Pain2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Extraskeletal ossification1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Osteolysis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 19, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED THAT, "PATIENT REQUIRED A TOTAL REVISION OF RIGHT HIP."

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15630873 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 11, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem

    PATIENT CALLED STATING HE HAD A RIGHT HIP REPLACEMENT DONE ON (B)(6) 2008 AND IS EXPERIENCING PAIN AS HE WALKS. PATIENT ALSO REPORTED THAT HIS DOCTOR MENTIONED BONE LOSS AND LOOSENING IN HIS HIP. PATIENT WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF HIS IMPLANTS WERE PART OF A RECALL.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Extraskeletal ossification; Inadequate Osseointegration; Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 9693264 ↗
  • InjuryJan 9, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    PATIENT HAD ORIGINAL LEFT HIP DONE BY DR. ON (B)(6) 2018. PATIENT HAVING PAINFUL SYMPTOMS X-RAY DIAGNOSIS OF OVERSIZED CUP.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 9568175 ↗
  • InjuryDec 5, 2019Device Damaged by Another Device; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Damaged by Another Device; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    DR. PERFORMING REVISION MENTIONED BLACK RESIDUE ON STEM AND INSIDE OF FEMORAL HEAD AND IMPLANTS WERE EXTRACTED FROM PATIENT. OSTEOREMEDIIES ANTIBIOTIC SPACERS USED.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 9418829 ↗
  • InjuryDec 27, 2017Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    IMPLANT WAS EXPLANTED FROM PATIENT'S LEFT HIP DUE TO IMPLANT MAL-POSITION AND REVISED WITH REVISION IMPLANT.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 7148450 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page