Skip to content

Trident 542-11-64HRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Cluster Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident (160)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04546540240552), received between Oct 22, 2018 and Oct 22, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • Injury1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 22, 2018Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    DR. STATED THAT THE CUP HAD SHIFTED CAUSING AN IMPINGEMENT ON THE RIM OF THE CERAMIC CUP WHICH ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN A FRACTURE OF THE CERAMIC. DR. REMOVED THE CERAMIC LINER AND CERAMIC HEAD. AFTER DEBRIDEMENT HE REPLACED WITH A NEW CERAMIC LINER AND CERAMIC HEAD. HE PLACED A V 4TOC TAPER SLEEVE RESULTING IN A FRESH TRUNNION. ITEM NOT EXPLANTED: 6021-0537. LOT 8509002. UPDATE (B)(6) 2018: AS REPORTED IN HOW WAS ISSUE NOTICED: PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 7992457 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page