Skip to content

Trident 500-11-56FRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Hemispherical Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident (160)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540431882), received between Oct 15, 2018 and Sep 10, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Injury2
  • Foreign Body Reaction1
  • Metal Related Pathology1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 10, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN LFIT ANATOMIC COCR V40 FEMORAL HEAD ON HER RIGHT HIP ON OR ABOUT (B)(6), 2006 AND WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2010. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT SHE SUFFERED INJURIES AS A RESULT OF IMPLANTATION OF THE DEVICE AT ISSUE, DEVICE RECALL, EXCESSIVE LEVELS OF CHROMIUM AND COBALT IN HIS BLOOD. UPDATE AS PER MEDICAL REVIEW: IT WAS FOUND THAT THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT WAS LOOSE AND THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF INFECTION OR ANY CORROSION OR TRUNNIONOSIS OR ALTR. THE DIAGNOSIS WAS ASEPTIC LOOSENING.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Inadequate Osseointegration; Metal Related Pathology

    MAUDE report 20182546 ↗
  • InjuryJan 25, 2019Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AS REPORTED: "RIGHT HIP [REVISION], POSSIBLE LOOSE IMPLANTS, HIP PAIN". A 56 TRIDENT SHELL, 36MM X3 POLY, 36 +2.5 BIOLOX HEAD, AND ACCOLADE II #7 STEM WERE REVISED TO COMPETITOR DEVICES.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8277388 ↗
  • InjuryOct 15, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED. PATIENT COMPLAINTS, PRE-REVISION OCCURRENCES OR DIAGNOSES, INTRA-OPERATIVE FINDINGS WERE NOT REPORTED TO THE REP. A SHELL, LINER AND HEAD WERE REVISED TO A COMPETITOR SHELL AND LINER WITH A STRYKER HEAD.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 7967467 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page