Trident 500-11-58FRecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Hemispherical Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Trident (160)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540431899), received between Mar 27, 2017 and Oct 11, 2018 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Loss of Osseointegration1
Patient problems
- Injury2
- Discomfort1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 11, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE ATTORNEY, THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT, THAT THE PLAINTIFF UNDERWENT A TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2016 WHERE HE WAS IMPLANTED WITH A STRYKER TRIDENT HIP SYSTEM. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT AFTER IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE PAIN AND DISCOMFORT IN THE AREA OF THE IMPLANTED DEVICE. AN ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON LATER DETERMINED THAT PLAINTIFF REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO DIAGNOSED LOOSENING. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY (B)(6) 2017.
Patient problems: Discomfort; Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Pain
MAUDE report 7957797 ↗InjuryMar 27, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
SALE REP REPORTED A PRIMARY RIGHT HIP SURGERY. ACETABULAR CUP MOVED DURING POST OPERATIVE OF WHICH THE SURGEON HAD TO REVISE WITH ANOTHER ACETABULAR CUP.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 6436003 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices
- Novation 134-36-45Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-28-650Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer89 reports
- Trident 690-00-28FHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall37 reports
- Trident 690-00-22EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall36 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-652Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer75 reports
- Trident 690-00-22DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall22 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-654Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer70 reports
- Trident 69-2850Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall11 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page