Skip to content

Trident 502-11-50DRecalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Hemispherical Acetabular Shell · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trident (160)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
12
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540432025), received between Jul 11, 2017 and May 27, 2026 — classified as 12 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loss of Osseointegration5
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information3
  • Migration2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Degraded1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Injury6
  • Inadequate Osseointegration5
  • Pain3
  • Bone Fracture(s)2
  • Hematoma1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 27, 2026Loss of Osseointegration

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: REVISION OF STRYKER 50 MM HA CUP AND LINER, 32 MM LFIT HEAD. DUE TO LOOSENING TO CAGE AND RIMFIT CEMENTED CUP.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 25305693 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. A SHELL, 2 SCREWS, LINER AND HEAD WERE REVISED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 15273482 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 21, 2022Degraded; Loss of Osseointegration; Migration; Degraded; Loss of Osseointegration; Migration

    EIGHT YEARS AGO, ACCOLADE TMZF, TRIDENT HEMISPHERICAL HA CLUSTER AND X3 LINER WERE IMPLANTED. THE CUP WAS FOUND TO BE LOOSE AND MIGRATING UPWARD, SO ONLY THE CUP AND HEAD WERE REVISED. WHEN THE HEAD WAS REMOVED, BLACK DISCOLORATION WAS OBSERVED AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN THE DELTA CERAMIC AND THE ACCOLADE TMZF. THE SURFACE OF THE CUP WAS SO SMOOTH THAT THE COATING WAS GONE ONLY ON THE LOWER PART. IT SEEMS THAT THE STRESS WAS APPLIED TO THE CUPS AND DISPERSED TO THE HEAD AND NECK. THERE HAS BEEN NO EXPERIENCE OF DISCOLORATION DUE TO WEAR ON DELTA CERAMIC HEADS (NOT A METAL HEAD).

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13573618 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2021Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. AS REPORTED BY REP: "LOOSE CUP AND BROKEN HIP SCREWS." SPOKE TO THE REP. THE SCREWS WERE BROKEN AT THE HEAD. TO REMOVE THE REMAINDER OF THE SCREWS, THE SURGEON DID NOT WANT TO GO AFTER THE SCREWS INDIVIDUALLY DUE TO THE POOR QUALITY OF THE PATIENT'S ACETABULUM. INSTEAD, THE REMAINDER OF THE SCREWS CAME OUT WITH BONE WHILE REAMING FOR A NEW CUP. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE CERAMIC HEAD WAS NOTED TO HAVE WORN DUE TO ARTICULATING AGAINST THE PATIENT'S PELVIS. THE SHELL, 2 SCREWS, LINER, AND HEAD WERE REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED LINER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 12356023 ↗
  • InjuryDec 5, 2020Unstable; Unstable

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO: "UNSTABLE TOTAL LEFT HIP." A TRIDENT HEMI CUP, 32 MM INSERT, AND TWO BONE SCREWS (25 MM AND 35 MM) WERE REVISED.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 10952464 ↗
  • InjuryNov 3, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    BONE RESORPTION IN FRONT OF THE CUP OCCURRED 4 YEARS AFTER THE TRIDENT CUP WAS INSERTED. A HEMATOMA NEAR IRIOPSIS OCCURRED. PER SALES REP, "IRIOPSIS IS IMPINGEMENT OF ANTERIOR CUP AND ILIOPSOAS MUSCLE."

    Patient problems: Hematoma

    MAUDE report 10781022 ↗
  • InjuryJul 9, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF THE SHELL AND PAIN. A SHELL, 2 SCREWS, AND A LINER WERE REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED LINER AND THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 10249725 ↗
  • InjuryApr 10, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED BY SCRUB TECHNICIAN THAT HIP REVISION WAS REQUIRED DUE TO PATIENT PAIN AFTER THE FIRST OPERATION SINCE (B)(6) 2019. THE X-RAY, REVEALED THAT THE PATIENT'S BONES ARE NOT CLINGING TO THE IMPLANT CUP SO SURGEON DECIDED TO REPLACE NEW CUP AND THE OPERATION CASE IS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY ON (B)(6) 2020.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 9949997 ↗
  • InjuryDec 16, 2019Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. THE ACETABULAR SHELL WAS REPORTED TO HAVE MIGRATED MEDIALLY. THE SHELL, LINER, AND HEAD WERE REVISED AND A LARGER SHELL WITH SCREWS, LINER AND HEAD IMPLANTED (THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE HEAD OR LINER).

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 9477337 ↗
  • InjuryApr 3, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED A SHATTERED ALUMINA FEMORAL HEAD WHICH WAS REVISED.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 8477781 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    REVISION SURGERY FOR ACETABULAR FRACTURE OF AN EXISTING EXETER TRIDENT HIP COMPLETED (B)(6) 2018 AT (B)(6) HOSPITAL. ORIGINAL LEFT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT WITH EXETER TRIDENT COMPLETED (B)(6) 2018 BY DR (B)(6).

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury

    MAUDE report 7813582 ↗
  • InjuryJul 11, 2017Loss of Osseointegration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Loss of Osseointegration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    PATIENT LEFT TOTAL HIP REVISION DUE TO ACETABULAR SHELL LOOSENING AND SUBSEQUENT DISLOCATION. PATIENT HAS A POSTERIOR WALL FRACTURE.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury

    MAUDE report 6704668 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, porous devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, porous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page