Skip to content

Accolade 6021-0740Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 127 Degree Neck Angle Hip Stem · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Accolade (57)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540510723), received between Jan 23, 2019 and Jun 14, 2023 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • Injury2
  • Pain2
  • Reaction2
  • Inflammation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 14, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED. AS REPORTED: "PATIENT INITIALLY PRESENTED TO CLINIC WHERE HE COMPLAINED OF PAIN IN HIS LEFT HIP. X-RAY REVEALED CATASTROPHIC FAILURE OF FEMORAL HEAD WITH FEMORAL HEAD DISSOCIATION. DAMAGE TO STEM AND CUP NECESSITATED REVISION OF ALL COMPONENTS. ALL COMPONENTS WERE WELL FIXED BUT EXPLANTED DUE TO DAMAGE. EXPLANTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE FOR RETURN."

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 17124024 ↗
  • InjuryOct 22, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED BY PATIENT'S ATTORNEY AS A RESULT OF A LEGAL CLAIM THAT ALLEGEDLY ON (B)(6) 2012 THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A STRYKER V40 FEMORAL HEAD ON HIS RIGHT HIP. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED "SUBSEQUENTLY HE DEVELOPED PROGRESSIVE GROIN PAIN AND RIGHT HIP PAIN AND A COBALT ION LEVEL THAT WAS EXTREMELY HIGH. DUE TO THIS, REVISION WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019."

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Injury; Pain; Reaction

    MAUDE report 9221084 ↗
  • InjuryJan 23, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE ATTORNEY THAT PLAINTIFF UNDERWENT A TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2010 AND HAD TO UNDERGO REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO ALLEGED ALTR.

    Patient problems: Injury; Reaction

    MAUDE report 8272518 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page