Trident 625-0T-36GRecalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Alpha Code G · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Trident (160)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540516862), received between May 31, 2018 and Apr 2, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Noise, Audible” (5 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P000013); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Noise, Audible5
- Degraded2
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Break1
- Fracture1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Material Fragmentation1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
Patient problems
- Injury7
- Pain6
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties3
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Dislocation1
- Metal Related Pathology1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 2, 2026Noise, Audible
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: HIP REVISION OF CERAMIC ON CERAMIC HIP DUE TO PATIENT COMPLAINT OF "SQUEAKING." LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24769946 ↗InjuryApr 20, 2022Noise, Audible; Noise, Audible
AS REPORTED: "LEFT REVISION HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY. SURGEON COMMENT: PATIENT COMPLAINED OF 'SQUEAKING.'" AN ALUMINA HEAD AND LINER WERE REVISED TO A BIOLOX HEAD AND SLEEVE AND A POLY INSERT.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties
MAUDE report 14160175 ↗InjuryOct 6, 2020Degraded; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Noise, Audible; Degraded; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Noise, Audible
REVISION SURGERY ON STRYKER IMPLANTS. REPLACED WITH STRYKER STEM AND FEMORAL HEAD AND DEPUY CUP AND INSERT(B)(6) 2020. PATIENT COMPLAINT OF PAIN AND SQUEEK / CLUNKINESS. SIGNS OF TRUNIONOSIS AND IMPINGEMENT NOTED BY SURGEON. STRIPE WEAR ON CERAMIC HEAD. LINER RIM DAMAGED BY WEAR FROM STEM REVISION ON PREVIOUS PRIMARY SURGERY.
Patient problems: Metal Related Pathology; Pain
MAUDE report 10633826 ↗InjuryFeb 27, 2020Fracture; Fracture
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT : "THE TRIDENT RIGHT HIP PROSTHESIS WAS PLACED THE 28/11/07 WITH THE IMPLANTS PROTHEOS. ON (B)(6) 2020 WE PROCEEDED TO CHANGE THE HEAD AND THE INSERT BECAUSE IT BROKE."
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 9762866 ↗InjurySep 11, 2019Degraded; Degraded
THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT HE UNDERTOOK A REVISION OF A TRIDENT EXETER HIP. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE EXETER TRUNNION WAS WORN. THE CERAMIC HEAD WAS BROKEN AND THE LINER HAD WEAR MARKS.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8997522 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2019Break; Material Fragmentation; Break; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED AFTER PATIENT COMPLAINT OF PAIN. INTRA- OPERATIVELY, BLACK TISSUE AND CERAMIC FRAGMENTS WERE NOTED, AND NO CERAMIC WAS INSIDE OF THE ALUMINA INSERT. THE SHELL, 2 SCREWS, ALUMINA LINER AND ALUMINA HEAD WERE REVISED. REP PROVIDED A PRIMARY OPERATIVE REPORT AND IMPLANT SHEET, PRE-REVISION X-RAYS, AND EXPLANT PICTURES.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Injury; Pain; Reaction
MAUDE report 8727826 ↗InjuryJan 3, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PATIENT PRESENTED ACUTELY TO HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2018 WITH PAIN, UNABLE TO WEIGHT BEAR AND DISLOCATED HIP. X-RAY TAKEN (PHOTO ATTACHED) AND IT WAS NOTED THAT EXETER STEM WAS BROKEN AT NECK LEVEL. INITIAL OPERATION OCCURRED 9 YEARS EARLIER. REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED AT TAURANGA HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2018 AND BROKEN STEM (44#4) ALONG WITH 36+5 ALUMINA CERAMIC HEAD AND 36G ALUMINA CERAMIC LINER WERE REMOVED. (ALL 3 ITEMS BEING RETURNED TO STRYKER AND PHOTOS ATTACHED). CEMENT IN CEMENT REVISION OF STEM PERFORMED (50#2) AND NEW 32+0 BIOLOX CERAMIC HEAD AND 32G 0 DEGREE X3 LINER IMPLANTED. REVISION SURGEON SAID THAT PATIENT HAD PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED A ¿GRINDING SENSATION¿ IN THE HIP PRIOR TO BREAK.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Injury; Pain
MAUDE report 8214877 ↗InjuryOct 22, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT AS A RESULT OF A LEGAL CLAIM THAT ALLEGEDLY AFTER THE IMPLANTATION HE DEVELOPED PAIN AND SWELLING WHICH WORSENS AS TIME WENT BY. DURING THE NEXT TWO YEARS BESIDES THE PAIN AND SWELLING THE LEG STARTED TO THUMP WHEN HE WALKED AND SOMETIMES THE HIP WOULD LOCK UP AND COULD NOT MOVE. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2017 AND DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SURGEON FOUND THAT THE BALL HAD DISINTEGRATED IN THE LEG AND FOUR HOURS WERE SPENT PICKING OUT SHARDS AND SPLINTERS THAT HAD EMBEDDED IN HIS LEG. UPDATE PER MEDICAL REVIEW: ¿ON (B)(6) 2017 HE HAD A LEFT HIP ASPIRATION UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA AND FLUOROSCOPIC CONTROL. TOE FLUID WAS SENT FOR GRAM STAIN, CULTURE AND CELL COUNT. LAB REPORT OF RESULTS OF (B)(6) 2017 LEFT HIP ASPIRATE RESULTS: "NO ORGANISMS SEEN" ON GRAM STAIN AND "NO GROWTH AT 3 DAYS" ON CULTURE. CELL COUNT FROM ASPIRATE IS NOT DIAGNOSTIC OF INFECTION.¿ ¿ON (B)(6) 2017 A REVISION LEFT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY (BOTH COMPONENTS) FOR A PRE AND POST-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF "LEFT HIP PAIN STATUS-POST THA, DISLOCATED LEFT HIP, LOOSENING OF HARDWARE". A BRIEF OPERATIVE REPORT DESCRIBES SPINAL ANESTHESIA AND A LATERAL APPROACH. THE
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Joint Dislocation; Pain; Swelling
MAUDE report 7992450 ↗InjuryJul 25, 2018Noise, Audible; Noise, Audible
SURGEON COMMENTED THAT PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING SOME GROIN PAIN AND SQUEAKING WHILE CLIMBING STAIRS.
Patient problems: Injury; Pain
MAUDE report 7718041 ↗InjuryMay 31, 2018Migration or Expulsion of Device; Noise, Audible; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Noise, Audible
IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT, THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT RECEIVED A TRIDENT CERAMIC ACETABULAR SYSTEM. IT IS ALLEGED THAT PATIENT "HAS SUFFERED AND CONTINUES TO SUFFER BOTH INJURIES AND DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE PHYSICAL AND METAL PAIN AND SUFFERING AND EXTRAORDINARY LOOSENING AND INFECTION. AS A RESULT OF THE IMPLANTATION OF THE DEVICE, THE PATIENT REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2011. UPDATE AS PER MEDICAL REVIEW: CLINICIAN CONCLUDED, "WHILE NO PRE-OP X-RAYS ARE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW, THE REVISING SURGEON NOTED MALPOSITION OF THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT OF THE PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY RESULTED IN IMPINGEMENT AND SUBLUXATION OF THE CERAMIC-CERAMIC BEARING WITH A SINGLE STRIPE WEAR NOTED ON THE ALUMINA HEAD.
Patient problems: Injury; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7556626 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P000013. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1703-2009 · Jun 9, 2009 · TerminatedTrident Acetabular System Surgical Protocol. Instructions for use of hip prosthesis. Literature Number LSP55.
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented839 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented643 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented335 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented263 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-330Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented255 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented253 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-056Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented220 reports
- SUMMIT POROCOAT 1570-11-120Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented1 death204 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page