Skip to content

Biolox 6570-0-032Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Ceramic V40 Femoral Head · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
16
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 16 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540608475), received between Mar 1, 2017 and May 6, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries, 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inaccurate Information” (5 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jan 14, 2022Open, Classified

    Potential product mix where the size and/or offset of the Biolox delta Ceramic V40 Femoral Head inside the package does not match the package labeling

    Z-0842-2022 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Inaccurate Information5
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information4
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Fracture2
  • Use of Device Problem2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Break1
  • Degraded1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • Injury3
  • Insufficient Information3
  • Joint Dislocation2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Fall1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Inflammation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 16 most recent of 16 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 6, 2026Degraded; Use of Device Problem

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO ECCENTRIC POLY WEAR. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A 32MM CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD INSIDE OF A 36D LINER, DESPITE THE USAGE FROM THE PRIOR PROCEDURE DOCUMENTING THAT A 36MM FEMORAL HEAD WAS IMPLANTED IN THE 36D LINER. THE HEAD AND LINER WERE REVISED TO A 36MM FEMORAL HEAD WITH A 36D LINER. HOSPITAL STAFF WANTS TO SPEAK TO SOMEONE AT STRYKER REGARDING THE FACT THAT A 32MM FEMORAL WAS IMPLANTED IN A 36D LINER AND SURGEON WANTS INVESTIGATION RESULTS. REP WILL PROVIDE ALL AVAILABLE DOCUMENTATION AND IMAGES AVAILABLE FROM THE HOSPITAL AND SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 25104146 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED: LEFT HIP REVISION. PT PRESENTED WITH A DISLOCATED HIP FOLLOWING A "COMPLEX" THA. DR. OPTED TO REVISE THE COMPETITOR LINER OPTION AND SWAP OUT OUR '32MM-4 HEAD' TO A '32MM+0 UNIVERSAL' OPTION. NO COMPLAINTS HAVE BEEN FILED AGAINST THE COMPONENTS THEMSELVES, NO FURTHER INFO AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 24979779 ↗
  • InjuryDec 4, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AS REPORTED: "PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO REOCCURRING DISLOCATIONS. STEM WAS RETAINED. NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY."

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 18263821 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2023Use of Device Problem; Device Handling Problem; Use of Device Problem; Device Handling Problem

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED: THE INCORRECT INNER HEAD WAS PLACED, WHICH WAS REVEALED IN THE POSTOPERATIVE X-RAYS. THE WOUND WAS IMMEDIATELY OPENED AND IT WAS REPLACED TO THE CORRECT INNER HEAD.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16486441 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 15, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    FEMORAL HEAD FRACTURE DUE TO FALL, REVISION SURGERY PLANNED.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 16383646 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 12, 2022Inaccurate Information; Inaccurate Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SURGEON NOTICED THE ACTUAL IMPLANTED HEAD WAS NOT -4MM, IT WAS +4MM HEAD.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14672585 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 3, 2022Inaccurate Information; Inaccurate Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT OUR CUSTOMER CHECKED X-RAY FOR PFA ((B)(4) , THE SURGEON SUSPECTED IT WAS +4MM/32MM.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13664366 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2022Inaccurate Information; Inaccurate Information

    STRYKER REP REPORTED THE WRONG SIZE IMPLANT IN BOX.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13502023 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 8, 2022Inaccurate Information; Inaccurate Information

    CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT IMPLANT LABELLED AS BIOLOX DELTA 32-4 BUT THE IMPLANT INSIDE WAS ACTUALLY 32+4. PRIMARY PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13487149 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 27, 2022Inaccurate Information; Inaccurate Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A THA, THE BOX LABEL WAS 6570-0-032 (-4MM) BUT THE CONTENT WAS A HEAD OF 6570-0-232 (+4MM). A METAL HEAD (32MM -4MM) WAS USED INSTEAD. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: ACTUALLY, A SPARE DELTA HEAD (6570-0-032) WAS USED INSTEAD, NOT METAL HEAD.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13370164 ↗
  • InjurySep 15, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IN REPORTING A REVISION OF THE PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP ON (B)(6) 2020, THE REP LEARNED THE PATIENT HAD A REVISION ON (B)(6) 2012 DUE TO INFECTION. THE FEMORAL HEAD ONLY WAS EXCHANGED. REP CONFIRMED NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON. THIS PI IS FOR THE (B)(6) 2012 REVISION.

    Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection

    MAUDE report 10533962 ↗
  • InjuryOct 8, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN LFIT ANATOMIC COCR V40 FEMORAL HEAD ON HER RIGHT HIP ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2016 AND WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2016. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT SHE SUFFERED INJURIES AS A RESULT OF IMPLANTATION AND EXPLANTATION OF THE DEVICE AT ISSUE AND EXCESSIVE LEVELS OF CHROMIUM AND COBALT IN HER BLOOD.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Injury; Metal Related Pathology; Reaction

    MAUDE report 9165803 ↗
  • InjurySep 9, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AS REPORTED: "PROCEDURE: I&D AND HEAD AND [COMPETITOR] LINER EXCHANGE. PRE-OP DIAGNOSIS: SEPTIC VS. ASEPTIC LOOSENING STATUS POST COMPLEX PRIMARY RIGHT TOTAL HIP. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE PER HOSPITAL". A 32 -4 BIOLOX HEAD WAS REVISED TO A 32 BIOLOX HEAD WITH -2.5 SLEEVE. SPOKE TO REP. PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. REP PROVIDED PRE-REVISION X-RAYS AND A USAGE SHEET FROM THE PRIOR PROCEDURE AND CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON. UPDATE 08 OCTOBER, 2019: REVIEW OF THE X-RAY BY A CLINICIAN CONFIRMS LOOSE CEMENTED STEM.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8977484 ↗
  • InjuryJul 2, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE SUBMISSION OF A REVISION IMPLANT SHEET THAT PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP WAS REVISED. A 32MM -4 BIOLOX HEAD WAS REVISED TO A 36MM +0 BIOLOX HEAD.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 7655592 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2018Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    THE SCRUB NURSE REMOVED THE ITEM FROM THE PACKAGING INTO THE STERILIZE FIELD AND IT WAS REALIZED THAT THERE WAS HAIR WITHIN THE STERILE PACKAGING. A SECOND DEVICE WAS AVAILABLE WITHOUT DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7444520 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 1, 2017Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem

    THE CERAMIC HEAD BROKE SPONTANEOUSLY AFTER BEING PLACED ON THE STEM, EVEN BEFORE THE HIP WAS RESHAPED. THE PROCEDURE WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH REPLACEMENT OF THE BROKEN ITEM.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6369971 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page