X3 1236-2-856Recalls & reported problems
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · X3 Insert · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540639011), received between Aug 16, 2019 and Aug 16, 2019 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
Patient problems
- Pain2
- Discomfort1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 16, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THIS PATIENT IS A SUBJECT IN (B)(6) STUDY. AT THE SUBJECT'S 6-YEAR FOLLOW-UP THE SUBJECT REPORTED OCCASIONAL, MILD PAIN THAT DOES NOT INTERFERE IN HIS DAILY ACTIVITIES. THE SUBJECT INDICATED HE WAS OVERALL SATISFIED WITH THE RESULTS OF HIS HIP REPLACEMENT.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8902602 ↗InjuryAug 16, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THIS PATIENT IS A SUBJECT IN STRYKER ADM X3 ACETABULAR SYSTEM STUDY. AT THE SUBJECT'S 7-YEAR FOLLOW UP VISIT, HE INDICATED HE HAD PAIN THAT WAS "UNCERTAIN AS TO ORIGIN, IMMEDIATE AREA ON HIP ONLY - SOME DISCOMFORT, NO INTENSE PAIN." SUBJECT REPORTED HE WAS OVERALL SATISFIED WITH THE RESULTS OF HIS HIP REPLACEMENT.
Patient problems: Discomfort; Pain
MAUDE report 8902393 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page