Skip to content

Restoration 6276-4-123Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Modular Hip System · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Restoration (86)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540641618), received between Oct 6, 2022 and Feb 15, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Joint Dislocation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 15, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO DISSOCIATION OF THE CONSTRAINED LINER FROM THE SHELL. THE CONSTRAINED LINER, HEAD AND REST MOD PROXIMAL BODY WERE REVISED. THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED HEAD. REASON FOR REVISING WAS NOT GIVEN TO REP WHEN HOSPITAL STAFF WAS ASKED (NEITHER WERE ANY ALLEGATIONS MADE OR OBSERVED).

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 18717801 ↗
  • InjuryOct 6, 2022Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    THIS PI IS FOR REVISION OF THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP ON (B)(6) 2022. WHILE PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR REVISION OF THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP ON B)(6) 2022, REP PROVIDED A USAGE SHEET FROM A PRIOR REVISION ON B)(6) 2022. REPORTING REP WAS NOT PRESENT FOR THE PROCEDURE, BUT A STRYKER REP WAS PRESENT. PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO DISSOCIATION OF THE CONSTRAINED LINER FROM THE SHELL. SURGEON DECIDED THAT THE PATIENT DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH OFFSET. A RESTORATION MODULAR PROXIMAL BODY (IMPLANTED B)(6) 2020), AND A CONSTRAINED LINER AND FEMORAL HEAD (IMPLANTED B)(6) 2021) WERE REVISED. THE SHELL (IMPLANTED B)(6) 2020) WAS NOT REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties

    MAUDE report 15550338 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page