Skip to content

Restoration 6276-7-020Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Modular Hip System · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Restoration (86)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540643780), received between Sep 8, 2017 and Oct 23, 2020 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Hip Fracture1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Injury1
  • Metal Related Pathology1
  • Osteolysis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 23, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THIS PI IS FOR REVISION1. I HAD THA REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE STEM WAS REPLACED WITH A STRYKER RESTORATION MODULAR ONE. THE 28 MM CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD WAS REPLACED WITH A COCR HEAD. HIP, GROIN, AND THIGH PAIN CONTINUED. ON (B)(6) 2019, I WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A STRESS FRACTURE AT THE TIP OF THE PROSTHETIC STEM. ON (B)(6) 2020, I HAD A BONE GRAFT TO REPAIR THE FRACTURE. A CLOUDY MILKY YELLOW FLUID ALONG WITH METAL DEBRIS WAS DISCOVERED IN THE HIP JOINT. ALSO, THERE WAS OSTEOLYSIS IN THE PROXIMAL FEMORAL FEMUR. THE ACETABULAR HAD OVERHANGING SCAR TISSUE AND BONE. THE TRUNION HAD STRIPE WEAR INDICATING IMPINGEMENT AND LIKELY SOURCE OF THE METALLOSIS. THE 28 MM FEMORAL HEAD WAS REPLACED WITH A 40MM COCR HEAD. SYMPTOMS OF METALLOSIS CONTINUE. FDA SAFETY REPORT ID# (8)(4). UPDATE: AS PER THE PATIENT, HE HAD A LEFT THA ON (B)(6) 2016. HE STARTED TO EXPERIENCE PAIN AT THE END OF (B)(6) 2016. THE PATIENT HAD A BONE SCAN DON ON (B)(6) 2017 (APPROX.) WHICH INDICATED INFECTION/IMPLANT LOOSENING. NO TREATMENT WAS GIVEN TO THE PATIENT. ON (B)(6) 2017 (APPROX.) HE WAS PLACED ON ORAL ANTIBIOTICS FOR 30 DAYS DUE TO INFECTION. ON (B)(6) 2017 X-RAYS CONFIRMED LOOSENING AND THE PATIENT WAS REV

    Patient problems: Hip Fracture; Inadequate Osseointegration; Metal Related Pathology; Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 10731085 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SURGEON PERFORMED A REVISION OF A PATIENT'S RIGHT HIP AFTER THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF PAIN. THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT IMPLANT HAD SUBSIDED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAYS.

    Patient problems: Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 6852625 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, porous devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, porous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page