Skip to content

Accolade 6720-0230Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 132 Degree Neck Angle Hip Stem · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Accolade (57)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540664457), received between Feb 19, 2019 and Dec 9, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Fracture1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Injury3
  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Inflammation1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Metal Related Pathology1
  • Pain1
  • Reaction1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 9, 2024Fracture; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Fracture; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE FOLLOWING WAS REPORTED: AFTER FAILURE OF THE PREVIOUSLY INSERTED STRYKER STEM FOLLOWING TUMOR RESECTION WITH HEMIPELVECTOMY, A REVISION WAS INDICATED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20880012 ↗
  • InjuryNov 30, 2021Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    ON (B)(6) 2013 PRIMARY SURGERY. ON (B)(6) 2019 X-RAY SHOWED RADIOLUCENT LINE AROUND RIGHT GREATER TROCHANTER. ON (B)(6) 2020 X-RAY SHOWED CLEARER RADIOLUCENT LINE AROUND RIGHT GREATER TROCHANTER. ON (B)(6) 2020 X-RAY SHOWED CLEARER RADIOLUCENT LINE AROUND RIGHT GREATER TROCHANTER AND BEHIND INTERTROCHANTER. NO INFECTION. ON (B)(6) 2021 REVISION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 12904797 ↗
  • InjuryOct 8, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN LFIT ANATOMIC COCR V40 FEMORAL HEAD ON HER RIGHT HIP ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2016 AND WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2016. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT SHE SUFFERED INJURIES AS A RESULT OF IMPLANTATION AND EXPLANTATION OF THE DEVICE AT ISSUE AND EXCESSIVE LEVELS OF CHROMIUM AND COBALT IN HER BLOOD.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Injury; Metal Related Pathology; Reaction

    MAUDE report 9165815 ↗
  • InjuryMay 13, 2019Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED AFTER PATIENT COMPLAINT OF PAIN. SURGEON REPORTED THAT THE SHELL LOOSENED AND LOOKED RETROVERTED. INTRA-OPERATIVELY, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE EDGE OF THE SHELL IMPINGED ON THE STEM AND NOTCHED IT, AND THE SURGEON REPORTED THE PRESENCE OF METALLOSIS. THE SHELL AND LINER WERE REVISED, THE STEM AND HEAD WERE RETAINED. THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE LINER (NO WEAR, DISCOLORATION, ETC). PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A TRITANIUM II SHELL AND MDM/ADM LINER CONSTRUCT. REP REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE. UPDATE 16/APRIL/2019: REP WAS ABLE TO PROVIDE A PRE-REVISION X-RAY AND AN INTRA-OPERATIVE PHOTO AND RE-CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WOULD BE AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Injury; Pain

    MAUDE report 8606052 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 19, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: PATIENT UNDERWENT LEFT HIP HEMI ARTHROPLASTY FOR FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE (B)(6) 2014. PATIENT RETURNED TO HAVE REVISION ARTHROPLASTY WITH INSERTION OF ANTIBIOTIC BEADS FOR HIP INFECTION (B)(6) 2014. ALL COMPONENTS EXCHANGED.

    Patient problems: Injury; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8352331 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page