Skip to content

Accolade 6720-0837Recalls & reported problems

Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · 132 Degree Neck Angle Hip Stem · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Accolade (57)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
14
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
12
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540664518), received between Feb 7, 2017 and Nov 17, 2023 — classified as 12 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information7
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Degraded1
  • Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Packaging Problem1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)7
  • Injury7
  • Reaction3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Fall1
  • Foreign Body Reaction1
  • Inflammation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 17, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO FEMORAL PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE (NO CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTOR WAS REPORTED TO THE SURGEON OR REP). A STEM AND HEAD WERE REVISED TO A RESTORATION MODULAR STEM CONSTRUCT AND A NEW HEAD. REP CONFIRMED THAT THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED HEAD, AND THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 18157992 ↗
  • InjuryAug 5, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS CONVERTED FROM A HEMI TO A TOTAL HIP DUE TO A FEMORAL PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. SURGEON'S ORIGINAL PLAN WAS TO ADDRESS THE FRACTURE WITH CABLES AND PLATES, BUT INTRA-OPERATIVELY THE STEM WAS FOUND TO BE GROSSLY LOOSE. A TOTAL HIP WITH A RESTORATION MODULAR STEM CONSTRUCT, HEAD, MDM/ ADM LINER CONSTRUCT, AND SHELL WERE IMPLANTED. REP PROVIDED PRIMARY USAGE AND CONFIRMED THERE WERE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED HEAD OR BIPOLAR COMPONENT. REP ALSO CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 15173839 ↗
  • InjuryMay 9, 2022Use of Device Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Use of Device Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT REPORTED FRACTURED LEFT FEMUR SHORTLY AFTER SURGERY. UPDATE (B)(6) 2022 WG: PER STRYKER REP, PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A RESTORATION MODULAR STEM CONSTRUCT WITH DALL MILES CABLES.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 14338488 ↗
  • InjuryNov 16, 2021Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO SUBSIDENCE OF THE FEMORAL STEM. THE STEM AND HEAD WERE REVISED. REP CONFIRMED THERE ARE NO ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE REVISED HEAD.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12819808 ↗
  • InjuryMar 12, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    (B)(6) 2019, FEMUR BROKE. SURGEON SAYS THAT DEVICE DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THIS EVENT. CONSERVATIVE THERAPY AND FOLLOW-UP WAS DONE.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 11472428 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2020Unstable; Unstable

    PROCEDURE: THE PATIENT UNDERWENT RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY (B)(6) 2020. PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION RIGHT TOTAL HIP FOR INSTABILITY ON (B)(6) 2020. HEAD, LINER AND STEM EXCHANGED.

    Patient problems: Injury; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 10458126 ↗
  • InjuryNov 27, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    AN MDM INSERT AND 28 BIOLOX HEAD WERE PUT TOGETHER ON THE BACK TABLE USING THE MDM INSTRUMENTATION. AFTER ASSEMBLY THE HEAD WAS CHECKED TO MAKE SURE THE 28 INNER HEAD MOVED FREELY INSIDE THE INSERT. THE SURGEON PROCEEDED TO IMPLANT WITH THE CORRECT HEAD PUSHER FROM THE SET AND THE INSERT AND HEAD DISASSOCIATED DURING HIP REDUCTION. UPDATE 31/OCTOBER/2019 WG: SPOKE TO REP. THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE OF EVENT OCCURRED DURING A PRIMARY RIGHT HIP PROCEDURE: A FEMORAL HEAD DISASSOCIATED FROM AN ADM/ MDM INSERT DURING REDUCTION. A SECOND FEMORAL HEAD AND ADM/ MDM INSERT WERE ASSEMBLED. PATIENT FACTORS (REPORTED BY THE SURGEON AS A COMBINATION OF THE PATIENT'S WEIGHT AND SPINAL PROBLEMS. THESE FACTORS APPLY TO THE NEXT TWO PAIRS OF HEADS AND LINERS) PROHIBITED THE HIP FROM BEING REDUCED, AND THE PATIENT'S FEMUR FRACTURED. THE ACCOLADE II STEM WAS REVISED TO A RESTORATION MODULAR STEM CONSTRUCT WITH DALL- MILES CABLE SETS. A THIRD PAIR OF FEMORAL HEAD AND ADM/MDM INSERT WERE ASSEMBLED AT THE BACK TABLE, AFOREMENTIONED PATIENT FACTORS PROHIBITED THE HIP FROM BEING REDUCED. A FOURTH PAIR OF ADM/ MDM INSERT AND FEMORAL HEAD WERE ASSEMBLED AT THE BACK TABLE, AFOREMENTIONED PATIENT FACTORS PROHIBIT

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 9385726 ↗
  • InjuryMar 28, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    PATIENT STATED HE WAS EXPERIENCING A LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH HIS LEFT HIP IMPLANT. PATIENT WANTS TO KNOW IF IMPLANTS ARE PART OF RECALL UPDATE: PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING CHRONIC PAIN. HE HAS TO USE A WHEEL CHAIR WHEN HE WALKS FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME. UPDATE: IT WAS REPORTED BY THE ATTORNEY THAT PLAINTIFF UNDERWENT A TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2013 AND HAD TO UNDERGO REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017 OF THE LFIT V40 HEAD DUE TO ALLEGED ALTR.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Injury; Pain; Reaction

    MAUDE report 8460883 ↗
  • InjuryJan 23, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE ATTORNEY THAT PLAINTIFF UNDERWENT A TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6), 2013 AND HAD TO UNDERGO REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017 OF THE LFIT V40 HEAD DUE TO ALLEGED ALTR.

    Patient problems: Injury; Reaction

    MAUDE report 8272519 ↗
  • InjurySep 26, 2018Degraded; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Degraded; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE FILING OF A LAWSUIT THAT ALLEGEDLY THE PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH AN LFIT ANATOMIC COCR V40 FEMORAL HEAD ON HIS LEFT HIP ON OR ABOUT (B)(6) 2013. IT IS FURTHER ALLEGED THAT HE SUFFERED INJURIES AS A RESULT OF IMPLANTATION OF THE DEVICE AT ISSUE, EXCESSIVE LEVELS OF CHROMIUM AND COBALT IN HIS BLOOD. PATIENT HAS NOT YET SCHEDULED A SURGERY FOR EXPLANTATION OF THE FEMORAL HEAD.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Inflammation; Injury; Metal Related Pathology; Reaction

    MAUDE report 7912120 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURE OF TOTAL RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Injury

    MAUDE report 7161646 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 2, 2017Packaging Problem; Packaging Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PRIMARY IMPLANT OF THE ACCOLADE II 132 ANGLE STEM, BOTH OUTER AND INNER PACKAGING WERE FOUND TO BE COMPROMISED. SURGEON USED A 127 ANGLE STEM INSTEAD. SURGICAL DELAY WAS REPORTED TO BE UNDER 5 MINUTES WITH NO ADVERSE AFFECTS TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6759733 ↗
  • InjuryMar 14, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    PATIENT REPORTED A REVISION OF A HIP FRACTURE DUE TO FALL.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Fall; Injury

    MAUDE report 6404865 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 7, 2017Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem; Material Integrity Problem; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED ON THE IMPLANT, LOOKS LIKE FRIZZY WHITE COTTON LIKE MATERIAL. IT WAS REPORTED THEY DECIDED NOT TO IMPLANT AND ALLEGEDLY KEPT IMPLANT AND ORIGINAL BOX.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 6307144 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, porous devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, porous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page