Excelsior SL-10 M0031681910Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · 2 Tip Pre-Shaped 90 Microcatheter · Class 2
All models of Excelsior SL-10 (7)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540688231), received between Dec 6, 2016 and May 24, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Fracture3
- Peeled/Delaminated3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Leak/Splash1
- Misassembled1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
- Aneurysm1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Rupture1
- Ruptured Aneurysm1
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 24, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT CATHETER PTFE (POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE) INNER LINING PEELING. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19397729 ↗MalfunctionDec 14, 2023Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
THE CATHETER (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS, AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE CATHETER SHAFT (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS BLOCKED WITH PTFE (POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE) LINING FROM THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED IT WITH A NEW DEVICE AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18327425 ↗MalfunctionApr 20, 2023Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STROKE PROCEDURE THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER BROKE SPONTANEOUSLY INTO TWO PIECES AT THE JUNCTION OF THE RHV AND 3-WAY, SO INSIDE THE FLUSHING SYSTEM. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY BUT THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16781007 ↗MalfunctionOct 13, 2022Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE FOUND THAT THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER PTFE (POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE)COATING WAS PEELING. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15593054 ↗InjuryJan 27, 2022Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE COILING PROCEDURE FOR THE RIGHT PERI CAVERNOUS DURAL ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA, THE DISTAL FLUORO SAVER MARKER ON THE SUBJECT MICROCATHETER WAS DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY. THE DETACHED FLUORO SAVER MARKER WAS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT ¿S VENOUS CHANNEL WITHIN THE RIGHT PETROUS BONE AND WAS STABLE IN POSITION. THE PATIENT¿S CURRENT CONDITION WAS UNKNOWN. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING THE PATIENT IMPACT DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 13365801 ↗MalfunctionOct 7, 2020Misassembled; Misassembled
DURING IC-PC (INTERNAL CAROTID-POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY) RUPTURED ANEURYSM PROCEDURE AFTER ALIGNMENT OF COIL DETACH MARKER WITH THE INVERTED T BEYOND THE PROXIMAL MARKER OF MICROCATHETER (SUBJECT DEVICE), THE COIL COULD NOT BE REMOVED OUT OF THE MICROCATHETER FOR DETACHMENT BECAUSE THE COIL REMAINED IN THE CATHETER TIP. THE COIL WAS REMOVED, AND A NEW COIL WAS INSERTED. THE SUBJECT CATHETER MARKERS WERE ALIGNED IN THE SAME WAY, BUT THE SECOND COIL ALSO COULD NOT BE REMOVED OUT OF THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WAS MORE THAN 3 CM BETWEEN THE TIP MARKER AND THE PROXIMAL MARKER OF THE MICROCATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED IT WITH A NEW DEVICE AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10646146 ↗InjuryAug 4, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE TO TREAT SUB ARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE DUE TO ANEURYSM RUPTURE, TWO COILS WERE SUCCESSFULLY PLACED IN THE ANEURYSM. WHEN THE THIRD COIL USED, IT STUCK AT THE DISTAL TIP OF THE SUBJECT CATHETER. WHEN ATTEMPTING TO DISLODGE STUCK COIL, ANEURYSM RE-RUPTURED DUE TO MICROWIRE PIERCING THE ANEURYSM DOME. ONCE THE COIL WAS DISLODGED, PHYSICIAN TREATED RUPTURED ANEURYSM WITH SUBJECT CATHETER AND ADDITIONAL COILING. NO SURGICAL DELAY WAS REPORTED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. POST PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT SCORED A 15 ON THE GSC (GLASGOW COMA SCALE) AND WAS MOVING ALL LIMBS
Patient problems: Aneurysm; Rupture; Ruptured Aneurysm
MAUDE report 10365485 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2020Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER (SUBJECT DEVICE) BROKE DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10080825 ↗MalfunctionFeb 12, 2019Break; Break
ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE NOTED THAT THE MICROCATHETER TIP WAS BROKEN. NO CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8333603 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2017Break; Break
ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED MICROCATHETER (SUBJECT DEVICE) FOUND THAT IT WAS BROKEN AT APPROXIMATELY 131CM FROM THE HUB AND AT THE DISTAL TIP. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7051381 ↗InjuryJul 13, 2017Break; Break
DURING THE PROCEDURE THE RADIOGRAPHY WAS NOT SUCCESSFUL, SO THE PHYSICIAN CHECKED CAREFULLY AND FOUND THAT THE DISTAL SECTION OF THE MICROCATHETER (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS BROKEN. THE PHYSICIAN THEN WITHDREW THE MICROCATHETER AND THE GUIDEWIRE TOGETHER, AND THE GUIDEWIRE WAS ALSO FOUND TO BE BROKEN. THE BROKEN PART OF THE GUIDEWIRE AND MICROCATHETER WERE SNARED FROM THE VESSEL. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AFTER CHANGING THE DEVICES. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES REPORTED TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6711505 ↗MalfunctionDec 6, 2016Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
UPON REMOVAL OF THE SUBJECT DEVICE FROM THE PATIENT¿S BODY, THE PHYSICIAN OBSERVED SALINE LEAKING NEAR THE STRAIN RELIEF OF THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES REPORTED DUE TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6149034 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page