iSert Intraocular Lens 251 (yellow), +21.50DRecalls & reported problems
Hoya Medical Singapore Pte. Ltd. · Class 3 · Implant
All models of iSert Intraocular Lens (69)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04547480450322), received between May 3, 2019 and Apr 9, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Split, Cut or Torn4
- Break2
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant4
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Uveitis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 9, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN CHINA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. LEADING HAPTIC DOES NOT FOLD AS PER IFU. PRODUCT REPLACED IMMEDIATELY WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. NO PERMANENT OR NEGATIVE IMPACT ON PATIENT HEALTH EXPECTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024 IMDRF CODE: (B)(6), MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 19076699 ↗InjurySep 22, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN NEW ZEALAND. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. IMDRF CODE: A0414, MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 17802315 ↗InjuryJul 11, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN VIETNAM. ORIGINALLY ASSESSED AS NOT REPORTABLE TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES. OVD USED WAS REPORTED AS "UNKNOWN." DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION PROBLEM CODE: A0414 MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2020. EXPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2020. PATIENT IMPACT: DEVICE EXPLANTATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 17297466 ↗InjuryJul 5, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN VIETNAM. ORIGINALLY ASSESSED AS NOT REPORTABLE TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES. OVD USED WAS REPORTED AS "UNKNOWN." DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. PROBLEM CODE: A0414 MATERIAL SPLIT, CUT OR TORN. IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6)2020. EXPLANT DATE: (B)(6)2020. PATIENT IMPACT: DEVICE EXPLANTATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 17255826 ↗InjuryJul 12, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
REPORTED CASE OF INFLAMMATION / UVEITIS IN MEXICO. DATE OF SURGERY - NOT PROVIDED. DATE OF EVENT - NOT PROVIDED. ON 23-MAY-2022: MANUFACTURER'S DATE OF AWARENESS. ON 15-JUN-2022: AUTHORIZED COUNTRY REPRESENTATIVE ASSESSED AS A REPORTABLE EVENT TO COFEPRIS BY END OF YEAR.
Patient problems: Uveitis
MAUDE report 14989164 ↗MalfunctionJul 22, 2019Break; Break
BOTH LENSES WERE PREPARED CORRECTLY USING ADEQUATE AND CORRECT AMOUNT OF HELAON. AFTER INJECTION AND LENS UNFOLDING, CHIPS WERE NOTICED MISSING FROM THE OPTICS. THE LENSES WERE NOT EXPLANTED AS RISK TO THE PATIENT WAS CONSIDERED HIGHER IF EXPLANTING RATHER THAN LEAVING IN SITU. NO PATIENT IMPACT YET, BUT SHARP EDGES OF CHIPS IS CONCERNING AS COULD CAUSE PC RUPTURE AS CAPSULAR BAG SHRINKS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8813120 ↗InjuryMay 3, 2019Break; Break
REPORT FROM THE NURSE: WHEN I ADVANCE THE IMPLANT I NOTICED THE BACK HAPTIC WAS TRAILING, WHEN THE LENS WAS INJECTED THE BLUE TIP OF THE HAPTIC CAME OFF AND REMAINED IN THE CHAMBER. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE LENS FROM THE PATIENTS EYE AND SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED ANOTHER LENS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8579798 ↗
Other Intraocular Lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page