Skip to content

iSert Intraocular Lens 251 (yellow), +21.50DRecalls & reported problems

Hoya Medical Singapore Pte. Ltd. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of iSert Intraocular Lens (69)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04547480450322), received between May 3, 2019 and Apr 9, 2024 — classified as 6 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Split, Cut or Torn4
  • Break2
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant4
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Uveitis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 9, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN CHINA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. LEADING HAPTIC DOES NOT FOLD AS PER IFU. PRODUCT REPLACED IMMEDIATELY WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. NO PERMANENT OR NEGATIVE IMPACT ON PATIENT HEALTH EXPECTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024 IMDRF CODE: (B)(6), MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 19076699 ↗
  • InjurySep 22, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN NEW ZEALAND. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. IMDRF CODE: A0414, MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17802315 ↗
  • InjuryJul 11, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN VIETNAM. ORIGINALLY ASSESSED AS NOT REPORTABLE TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES. OVD USED WAS REPORTED AS "UNKNOWN." DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION PROBLEM CODE: A0414 MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2020. EXPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2020. PATIENT IMPACT: DEVICE EXPLANTATION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17297466 ↗
  • InjuryJul 5, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN VIETNAM. ORIGINALLY ASSESSED AS NOT REPORTABLE TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES. OVD USED WAS REPORTED AS "UNKNOWN." DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. PROBLEM CODE: A0414 MATERIAL SPLIT, CUT OR TORN. IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6)2020. EXPLANT DATE: (B)(6)2020. PATIENT IMPACT: DEVICE EXPLANTATION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17255826 ↗
  • InjuryJul 12, 2022Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    REPORTED CASE OF INFLAMMATION / UVEITIS IN MEXICO. DATE OF SURGERY - NOT PROVIDED. DATE OF EVENT - NOT PROVIDED. ON 23-MAY-2022: MANUFACTURER'S DATE OF AWARENESS. ON 15-JUN-2022: AUTHORIZED COUNTRY REPRESENTATIVE ASSESSED AS A REPORTABLE EVENT TO COFEPRIS BY END OF YEAR.

    Patient problems: Uveitis

    MAUDE report 14989164 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 22, 2019Break; Break

    BOTH LENSES WERE PREPARED CORRECTLY USING ADEQUATE AND CORRECT AMOUNT OF HELAON. AFTER INJECTION AND LENS UNFOLDING, CHIPS WERE NOTICED MISSING FROM THE OPTICS. THE LENSES WERE NOT EXPLANTED AS RISK TO THE PATIENT WAS CONSIDERED HIGHER IF EXPLANTING RATHER THAN LEAVING IN SITU. NO PATIENT IMPACT YET, BUT SHARP EDGES OF CHIPS IS CONCERNING AS COULD CAUSE PC RUPTURE AS CAPSULAR BAG SHRINKS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8813120 ↗
  • InjuryMay 3, 2019Break; Break

    REPORT FROM THE NURSE: WHEN I ADVANCE THE IMPLANT I NOTICED THE BACK HAPTIC WAS TRAILING, WHEN THE LENS WAS INJECTED THE BLUE TIP OF THE HAPTIC CAME OFF AND REMAINED IN THE CHAMBER. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE LENS FROM THE PATIENTS EYE AND SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED ANOTHER LENS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8579798 ↗

Other Intraocular Lens devices

All Intraocular Lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page