iSert Intraocular Lens 251 (yellow), +22.00DRecalls & reported problems
Hoya Medical Singapore Pte. Ltd. · Class 3 · Implant
All models of iSert Intraocular Lens (69)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04547480450339), received between May 6, 2016 and Jul 31, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break3
- Material Split, Cut or Torn2
- Sharp Edges1
- Torn Material1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Capsular Bag Tear1
- No Code Available1
- Tissue Damage1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 31, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn
Event occurred in China.Damaged haptic after/during implantation.The patient underwent cataract surgery with implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL). After the IOL was injected and implanted during the procedure, it was noted that the distal end of the posterior haptic had fractured. The broken haptic fragment remained inside the injector, resulting in loss of integrity of the implanted IOL's posterior haptic.Subsequent examination revealed no retained intraocular foreign body and no evidence of ocular structural damage at present. However, there remains a potential risk of IOL decentration/dislocation and capsular bag instability.Problem Code: A0414 - Material Split, Cut or Torn.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50108010 ↗InjuryMar 4, 2026Sharp Edges
EVENT OCCURRED IN CHINA. LEADING; CAPSULAR BAG TEAR / RUPTURE; PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED. THE PATIENT, (B)(6), UNDERWENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION WITH INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION UNDER TOPICAL ANESTHESIA ON (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE IMPLANTATION PROCESS, THE ANTERIOR HAPTIC OF THE INTRAOCULAR LENS TORE THE POSTERIOR CAPSULE WHILE UNFOLDING. AFTER ADJUSTING THE POSITION OF THE INTRAOCULAR LENS, IT WAS CENTERED IN THE CAPSULAR BAG. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SMOOTHLY WITH NO ADVERSE EFFECTS. ALTHOUGH WE REQUESTED THE HOSPITAL TO PROVIDE SURGICAL PHOTOS, NO PICTURES OR VIDEOS WERE AVAILABLE FOR THE INVESTIGATION. PROBLEM CODE: A051102 - SHARP EDGES.
Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear
MAUDE report 24510716 ↗InjuryJan 27, 2021Break; Break
DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. HAPTIC TIP WAS SEPARATED AND STUCK IN INJECTOR DURING USE. INTRA-OPERATIVE EXPLANTATION, A NEW LENS WAS IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11235921 ↗InjurySep 9, 2019Break; Break
ON (B)(6) 2019 AT 10 AM, THE PATIENT WAS ACCEPTED THE SURGERY OF CATARACT PHACO AND IOL IMPLANTATION. AFTER IMPLANTATION, DOCTOR FOUND THE OPTIC OF LENS WAS INSERT INTO PATIENT EYE, HOWEVER HAPTIC WERE REMAIN AT INJECTOR, DOCTOR CONSIDERED THAT THE IOL HAS BEEN CRACKED OR BROKEN. IN ORDER TO PREVENT FROM INJURY TO THE PATIENT, DOCTOR EXPLANTED THE CRACKED IOL FROM PATIENT EYE AT 10:05AM AND REPLACED A NEW IOL TO CONTINUE WITH SURGERY. FINALLY, IT HAS BEEN DONE SUCCESSFULLY, THERE WAS NO INJURY TO PATIENT. PATIENT IMPACT: INTRA-OPERATIVE EXPLANTATION. EVENT OCCURRED IN CHINA, AND WAS REPORTED BY THE HOSPITAL AS AE TO CHINESE AUTHORITY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8976751 ↗MalfunctionApr 4, 2019Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
WHEN THE LENS WAS INSERTED ONE OF THE HAPTICS BROKE OFF, THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER ONE. NO PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8484746 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2018Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAPSULAR BAG WAS BROKEN AS THE SURGEON WAS ATTEMPTING TO POSITION THE LENS IN THE EYE. THE LENS HAD TO BE REMOVED AS A RESULT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED BUT HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7186099 ↗MalfunctionMay 6, 2016Torn Material
THE HOYA 251 TORE DURING IOL INSERTION, AND PART OF THE TRAILING HAPTIC WAS STILL IN THE INJECTOR. THE SURGEON HAD TO ENLARGE THE INCISION TO CUT OUT THE INITIAL LENS, AND ANOTHER HOYA WAS IMPLANTED. SURGERY WAS COMPLETED AND PATIENT PROGNOSIS WAS REPORTED AS GOOD.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 5638008 ↗
Other Intraocular Lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page