Skip to content

iSert Intraocular Lens 250 (clear), +13.00DRecalls & reported problems

Hoya Medical Singapore Pte. Ltd. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of iSert Intraocular Lens (69)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04547480480640), received between Dec 29, 2015 and Dec 6, 2016 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Integrity Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Out-Of-Box Failure1
  • Positioning Problem1

Patient problems

  • Excessive Tear Production1
  • Eye Injury1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 6, 2016Material Integrity Problem; Positioning Problem

    REPORT STATED AFTER IOL WAS INSERTED INTO THE EYE, WHEN SURGEON WAS "DIALING" IT INTO PLACE, A ROUGH EDGE ON THE IOL CAUSED A TEAR IN POSTERIOR CAPSULE. THE LENS WAS CENTERED IN CAPSULE WHEN PATIENT LEFT THE O.R. THE LENS MAY NEED TO BE EXPLANTED IN THE FUTURE IF IT DOES NOT STAY IN PLACE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON NOVEMBER 11, 2016 INDICATED THAT THE LENS WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2016 AND WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER IOL (AR-40).

    Patient problems: Excessive Tear Production; Eye Injury

    MAUDE report 6149220 ↗
  • InjuryDec 29, 2015Out-Of-Box Failure

    THIS ISSUE WAS REPORTED BY PHYSICIAN AS "THE LENS ARRIVED DAMAGED AND THE OPTIC HAD WHAT LOOKED LIKE SHARK BITES ON IT." THIS ISSUE ON THE OPTIC WAS NOTED DURING THE IMPLANT PROCEDURE. THE IOL NEEDED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S EYE, AND INCISION ENLARGED IN ORDER TO EXPLANT THE LENS.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 5332967 ↗

Other Intraocular Lens devices

All Intraocular Lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page