iSert Intraocular Lens 250 (clear), +21.50DRecalls & reported problems
Hoya Medical Singapore Pte. Ltd. · Class 3 · Implant
All models of iSert Intraocular Lens (69)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 8
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04547480480817), received between Dec 1, 2015 and Feb 27, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Split, Cut or Torn4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Optical Decentration1
- Packaging Problem1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant5
- Edema1
- Eye Injury1
- Tissue Damage1
- Visual Disturbances1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 27, 2026Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. TRAILING; MIDDLE; DAMAGED HAPTIC. WOUND STRETCH; INCREASED INCISION SIZE. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2025. PROBLEM CODE: A0414 - MATERIAL SPLIT, CUT OR TORN.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 24466364 ↗InjuryDec 3, 2025Optical Decentration; Optical Decentration
EVENT OCCURRED IN CHINA. THE PATIENT, WHO HAD SUFFERED FROM PROGRESSIVE VISUAL IMPAIRMENT IN THE RIGHT EYE FOR OVER 2 YEARS AND WAS IN THE MATURE STAGE OF CATARACT, UNDERWENT PHACOEMULSIFICATION AND INTRAOCULAR LENS (IOL) IMPLANTATION IN THE RIGHT EYE AT OUR HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2025. ON THE FIRST POSTOPERATIVE DAY ((B)(6) 2025), THE PATIENT WAS CONSCIOUS, IN GOOD SPIRITS, AND HAD NO DISCOMFORT SUCH AS EYE PAIN OR HEADACHE. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION REVEALED CONJUNCTIVAL CONGESTION, CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL EDEMA AND FOLDS, A NORMAL ANTERIOR CHAMBER DEPTH, A PUPIL DIAMETER OF 2.5 MM, AND A WELL-POSITIONED IOL WITH GOOD REFLECTION. THE PATIENT REQUESTED DISCHARGE AND WAS DISCHARGED ACCORDINGLY. ON THE MORNING OF THE SECOND POSTOPERATIVE DAY ((B)(6) 2025), THE PATIENT RETURNED TO OUR OUTPATIENT CLINIC COMPLAINING OF PAIN IN THE OPERATED EYE. THE INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE WAS FOUND TO BE ELEVATED, AND THE IOL WAS DISLOCATED INFEROTEMPORALLY. THE PHYSICIAN ADMINISTERED 250 ML OF 20% MANNITOL INTRAVENOUSLY TO LOWER THE INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE, AND THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER HOSPITAL FOR FURTHER TREATMENT. AT THE EXTERNAL HOSPITAL, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT "VITRECTOMY AND IOL REPOSITIO
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 23711783 ↗InjuryDec 27, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. TRAILING; MIDDLE. CORNEAL EDEMA; INCREASED INCISION SIZE. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED. NO PERMANENT OR NEGATIVE IMPACT ON PATIENT HEALTH EXPECTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6)2024. PROBLEM CODE: A0414 - MATERIAL SPLIT, CUT OR TORN.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 21029269 ↗InjuryAug 21, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN CHINA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. TRAILING; ROOT; DAMAGED HAPTIC. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6)2024. PROBLEM CODE: A0414, MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 20013864 ↗InjuryNov 21, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. IMDRF CODE: A0414, MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. WOUND STRETCH; INCREASED INCISION SIZE. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18188554 ↗InjuryMay 17, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2022. DATE OF EVENT: (B)(6) 2022. EVENT OCCURRED IN (B)(6). MANUFACTURER'S DATE OF AWARENESS: 19 APR 2022 INFLAMMATION; CORNEAL EDEMA, BULBAR HYPEREMIA, BLURRY VISION, CELL ADHESION. PATIENT CONDITION AND SYMPTOMS: VISUAL DISTRIBANCES. HEALTH IMPACT: MEDICATION REQUIRED.
Patient problems: Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 14418493 ↗MalfunctionDec 8, 2017Break; Detachment Of Device Component
FOLLOW-UP REPORT: IT WAS STATED THAT THE TRAILING LENS HAPTIC WAS FOUND TO BE MISSING AFTER INSERTION OF THE LENS. THE BROKEN HAPTIC HAD REMAINED INSIDE THE CARTRIDGE. IT WAS ALSO CLARIFIED THAT NO INCISION ENLARGEMENT OR SUTURES WERE REQUIRED FOR THIS SURGERY. THE PHYSICIAN ATTRIBUTED THE ISSUE TO THE LENS BECOMING STUCK IN THE DELIVERY DEVICE. REGARDING THE PROGNOSIS, THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL. BASED ON THIS INFORMATION, THE REPORTED EVENT IS NO LONGER CONSIDERED SERIOUS.
Patient problems: Tissue Damage
MAUDE report 7100720 ↗InjuryFeb 1, 2017Packaging Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED HOYA 250 LENS ON (B)(6) 2016 AT OUTPATIENT SURGICAL CENTER IN (B)(6). AFTER 2 MONTHS, (B)(6) 2016 THE SURGEON REMOVED THE LENS DUE TO "POWER MISS." ON JAN 13, 2017 HOYA RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM B AND L STATING THE SURGEON BELIEVED THE HOYA IOL WAS MISLABELED. ON (B)(6) 2016 THE HOYA LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A B AND L LI61AO MODEL LENS +18.5 DIOPTER. ON (B)(6) 2017 MODEL LI61AO +18.5 DIOPTER LENS WAS EXCHANGED AND SURGEON BELIEVED A "POWER MISS" AND REPLACED WITH LI61AO + 20.0 DIOPTER. ALSO REPORTED HOYA LENS NHR505R1 +21.5 WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2016 AND A DAY AFTER, ON (B)(6) 2016 THE PATIENT DEVELOPED MYOPIC SIGHT -4.00. THE SIZE OF CAPSULORHEXIS WAS 5.L VICTUS WITH INTENDED TARGET -2.00. PHYSICIAN BELIEVES BOTH HOYA AND B&L LENSES WERE MISLABELED AND TO BE THE MOST LIKELY CAUSE OF THE REFRACTIVE ERROR. THE PATIENT'S CURRENT PROGNOSIS AND TREATMENT ON (B)(6) 2017 (1 DAY POST-OP) IS EDEMA.
Patient problems: Edema
MAUDE report 6294668 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2015Insufficient Device Problem Information
HAPTIC TORE IN THE EYE WHEN ROTATED. INCISION WAS ENLARGED TO EXPLANT THE LENS.
Patient problems: Eye Injury
MAUDE report 5259693 ↗
Other Intraocular Lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page