Skip to content

iSert Intraocular Lens 250 (clear), +22.00DRecalls & reported problems

Hoya Medical Singapore Pte. Ltd. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of iSert Intraocular Lens (69)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
11
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04547480480824), received between Apr 5, 2016 and May 9, 2025 — classified as 8 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 2 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn4
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Optical Decentration1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant4
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Clouding, Central Corneal1
  • Eye Injury1
  • Rupture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 9, 2025Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN CHINA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION AND REQUIRED EXPLANTATION. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2025. PROBLEM CODE: A0414 - MATERIAL SPLIT, CUT OR TORN.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 21999013 ↗
  • InjuryDec 27, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. TRAILING; MIDDLE. INCREASED INCISION SIZE. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024. PROBLEM CODE: A0414 - MATERIAL SPLIT, CUT OR TORN.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 21031300 ↗
  • InjuryNov 26, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. TRAILING; TIP; DAMAGED HAPTIC. INCREASED INCISION SIZE. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024. PROBLEM CODE: A0414 - MATERIAL SPLIT, CUT OR TORN.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 20789339 ↗
  • InjuryNov 26, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. TRAILING; TIP; DAMAGED HAPTIC. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED; PATIENT HAS RECOVERED AND IS FINE. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024. PROBLEM CODE: A0414 - MATERIAL SPLIT, CUT OR TORN.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 20787561 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2020Optical Decentration; Optical Decentration

    RETURNED IMPLANT CARD STATES "LENS BECAME DISLOCATED IN THE EYE - WILL BE REMOVED AT A LATER DATE." DISTRIBUTOR MADE SEVERAL ATTEMPTS TO GATHER MORE INFORMATION, BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. NO OTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE. DATE EXPLANTED IS NOT KNOWN.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 11038485 ↗
  • InjuryJun 11, 2019Break; Break

    TORN HAPTIC - IOL HAD TO BE EXPLANTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8689703 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 11, 2019Break; Break

    TRAINING HAPTIC WAS TORN OFF IN INJECTOR AND REMAINED THERE AS THE REST OF THE IOL WAS STABLE AND WOULD CAUSE NO HARM.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8689700 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 11, 2019Break; Break

    THE TRAINING HAPTIC FELL OFF. LENS HAS BEEN LEFT IN PATIENTS EYE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8689684 ↗
  • InjuryJan 11, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE SURGEON REMOVED A FRAGMENT OF HAPTIC FROM THE IOL IMPLANT FROM THE ANTERIOR CHAMBER. PATIENT HAD CATARACT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017, NO PROBLEMS NOTED AT THE TIME BUT ON REVIEW APPOINTMENT APPARENT THAT THE CORNEA WAS OEDEMATOUS. SUBSEQUENTLY REFERRED TO DR. FOR OPINION AND APPARENT THAT THERE WAS A BLUE END OF THE HAPTIC OF THE LENS IMPLANT IN THE FRONT CHAMBER OF THE EYE. THERE HAVE BEEN OTHER OCCURRENCES OF THE BACK HAPTIC TEARING OFF WHILE BEING INJECTED, BUT WAS OBVIOUSLY DAMAGED AT THE TIME BUT NOT APPARENT, AND IT HAS SUBSEQUENTLY BECOME COMPLETELY DETACHED AND LOOSE IN THE ANTERIOR CHAMBER, DAMAGING THE ENDOTHELIAL CELLS AND CAUSING THE CORNEA TO BECOME CLOUDY. PATIENT INFORMATION- PATIENT OUTCOME REMAINS UNKNOWN, HOWEVER ACTION TAKEN BY THE HEALTHCARE FACILITY TO THE CARE OF THE PATIENT: REMOVING THE FRAGMENT TO PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE WAS THE FIRST STEP. THE CORNEA HAS CLEARED SOMEWHAT SINCE. TIME WILL TELL WHETHER THE CORNEA WILL CLEAR FULLY, OR IF THE PATIENT WILL REQUIRE AN ENDOTHELIAL CORNEAL TRANSPLANT.

    Patient problems: Clouding, Central Corneal; Eye Injury

    MAUDE report 7183354 ↗
  • InjuryMay 8, 2017Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A BROKEN CAPSULE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6552133 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 5, 2016Insufficient Device Problem Information

    REPORT STATED POSTERIOR CAPSULE RUPTURE THAT OCCURRED RIGHT AFTER IOL IMPLANTATION. PATIENT PROGNOSIS IS REPORTED AS GOOD, AND THE SURGEON DID NOT NEED TO ENLARGE THE INCISION TO REMOVE THE IOL.

    Patient problems: Rupture

    MAUDE report 5548107 ↗

Other Intraocular Lens devices

All Intraocular Lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page