iSert Intraocular Lens 250 (clear), +23.00DRecalls & reported problems
Hoya Medical Singapore Pte. Ltd. · Class 3 · Implant
All models of iSert Intraocular Lens (69)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04547480480848), received between Aug 11, 2017 and Sep 15, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Split, Cut or Torn4
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
- Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Material Opacification1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant5
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Capsular Bag Tear1
- Visual Impairment1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 15, 2026Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50781859 ↗InjuryDec 27, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. TRAILING; MIDDLE. INCREASED INCISION SIZE. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024. PROBLEM CODE: A0414 - MATERIAL SPLIT, CUT OR TORN.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 21031315 ↗InjuryFeb 24, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN CHINA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HAS RECOVERED AND IS FINE. PROBLEM CODE: A0414, MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18774736 ↗InjuryNov 22, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. IMDRF CODE: A0414, MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN. INCREASED INCISION SIZE. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18196831 ↗InjuryNov 22, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION IMDRF CODE: A0414, MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN INCREASED INCISION SIZE. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18196780 ↗MalfunctionJul 8, 2021Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Contamination /Decontamination Problem
PACKAGING PROBLEM; THERE IS UNKNOWN DEBRIS AT OPENING POUCH. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THE EVENT OCCURRED IN (B)(6). THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT, HOWEVER IT WAS REPORTED TO THE (B)(6) BY THE HOSPITAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12136909 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2021Material Opacification; Material Opacification
IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2018: POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; OCCURRENCE OF PCO WITHIN 5 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION PCO HAS OCCURRED, PERMANENT OR NEGATIVE IMPACT ON PATIENT HEALTH EXPECTED; VISUAL ACUITY DROPPED/IMPACTED, YAG LASER TREATMENT WAS DONE. (B)(4).
Patient problems: Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 11346044 ↗InjuryAug 11, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION OF THE LENS IN THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE, THE LENS DISLOCATED AND THERE WAS POSTERIOR CAPSULE TEAR/RUPTURE. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED INTRAOPERATIVELY WITH A DIFFERENT MODEL IOL THAT WAS PLACED IN THE SULCUS. NO VITRECTOMY WAS PERFORMED. THE INCISION WAS NOT ENLARGED AND SUTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED. ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE LIKELY CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS "SURGICAL TECHNIQUE." CURRENT PATIENT PROGNOSIS WAS DESCRIBED AS "EXCELLENT PROGNOSIS."
Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear; Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6789230 ↗
Other Intraocular Lens devices
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens146 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens145 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens144 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens139 reports
- TECNIS SIMPLICITY DIB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens1 recall81 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens129 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens127 reports
- TECNIS IOL PCB00Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. · intraocular lens126 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page