Skip to content

iSert Intraocular Lens 250 (clear), +23.00DRecalls & reported problems

Hoya Medical Singapore Pte. Ltd. · Class 3 · Implant

All models of iSert Intraocular Lens (69)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04547480480848), received between Aug 11, 2017 and Sep 15, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Split, Cut or Torn” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 2 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Split, Cut or Torn4
  • Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
  • Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Material Opacification1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant5
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Capsular Bag Tear1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 15, 2026Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50781859 ↗
  • InjuryDec 27, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. TRAILING; MIDDLE. INCREASED INCISION SIZE. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024. PROBLEM CODE: A0414 - MATERIAL SPLIT, CUT OR TORN.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 21031315 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 24, 2024Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN CHINA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HAS RECOVERED AND IS FINE. PROBLEM CODE: A0414, MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 18774736 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA. DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION. IMDRF CODE: A0414, MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN. INCREASED INCISION SIZE. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED. IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 18196831 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    EVENT OCCURRED IN MALAYSIA DAMAGED HAPTIC AFTER IMPLANTATION IMDRF CODE: A0414, MATERIAL SPLIT CUT OR TORN INCREASED INCISION SIZE. PRODUCT REPLACED WITH ANOTHER LENS IMMEDIATELY DURING SURGERY. PATIENT HEALTH NOT IMPACTED IOL WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 18196780 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 8, 2021Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Contamination /Decontamination Problem

    PACKAGING PROBLEM; THERE IS UNKNOWN DEBRIS AT OPENING POUCH. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THE EVENT OCCURRED IN (B)(6). THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT, HOWEVER IT WAS REPORTED TO THE (B)(6) BY THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12136909 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 18, 2021Material Opacification; Material Opacification

    IMPLANT DATE: (B)(6) 2018: POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; OCCURRENCE OF PCO WITHIN 5 DAYS AFTER IMPLANTATION PCO HAS OCCURRED, PERMANENT OR NEGATIVE IMPACT ON PATIENT HEALTH EXPECTED; VISUAL ACUITY DROPPED/IMPACTED, YAG LASER TREATMENT WAS DONE. (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 11346044 ↗
  • InjuryAug 11, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION OF THE LENS IN THE PATIENT'S RIGHT EYE, THE LENS DISLOCATED AND THERE WAS POSTERIOR CAPSULE TEAR/RUPTURE. THE LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED INTRAOPERATIVELY WITH A DIFFERENT MODEL IOL THAT WAS PLACED IN THE SULCUS. NO VITRECTOMY WAS PERFORMED. THE INCISION WAS NOT ENLARGED AND SUTURE WAS NOT REQUIRED. ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE LIKELY CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS "SURGICAL TECHNIQUE." CURRENT PATIENT PROGNOSIS WAS DESCRIBED AS "EXCELLENT PROGNOSIS."

    Patient problems: Capsular Bag Tear; Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 6789230 ↗

Other Intraocular Lens devices

All Intraocular Lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page