Short Clip HX-610-090S (UDI 04953170200335)Recalls & reported problems
Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170200335), received between Dec 21, 2022 and Aug 21, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Reprocessing Problem” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Reprocessing Problem2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Failure to Clean Adequately1
- Off-Label Use1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
- Perforation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 21, 2023Device Reprocessing Problem; Device Reprocessing Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO OLYMPUS THE SHORT CLIP WAS STUCK INSIDE OF THE FORCEPS CHANNEL. THE REPORTED ISSUE WAS DISCOVERED DURING A DIAGNOSTIC LOWER ENDOSCOPY PROCEDURE. THE SUCTION BUTTON WAS REPLACED BECAUSE IT BECAME DIFFICULT TO SUCTION DURING THE PROCEDURE WHEN IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT A CLIP WAS STUCK INSIDE OF THE CHANNEL. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT A CLIP WAS NOT USED DURING THIS PROCEDURE AND THAT THE LAST TIME THE CLIP WAS USED IN THE ENDOSCOPE WAS DURING PROCEDURES ON (B)(6) 2023. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT/USER HARM OR INJURY REPORTED DUE TO THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17584404 ↗MalfunctionAug 18, 2023Failure to Clean Adequately; Failure to Clean Adequately
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED TO OLYMPUS THE SHORT CLIP WAS STUCK INSIDE OF THE FORCEPS CHANNEL. THE REPORTED ISSUE WAS DISCOVERED DURING A DIAGNOSTIC LOWER ENDOSCOPY PROCEDURE. THE SUCTION BUTTON WAS REPLACED BECAUSE IT BECAME DIFFICULT TO SUCTION DURING THE PROCEDURE WHEN IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT A CLIP WAS STUCK INSIDE OF THE CHANNEL. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT A CLIP WAS NOT USED DURING THIS PROCEDURE AND THAT THE LAST TIME THE CLIP WAS USED IN THE ENDOSCOPE WAS DURING PROCEDURES ON (B)(6) 2023. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT/USER HARM OR INJURY REPORTED DUE TO THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17576475 ↗MalfunctionAug 18, 2023Device Reprocessing Problem; Off-Label Use; Device Reprocessing Problem; Off-Label Use
THE SUCTION BUTTON WAS REPLACED BECAUSE IT BECAME DIFFICULT TO SUCTION DURING THE PROCEDURE WHEN IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT A CLIP WAS STUCK INSIDE OF THE CHANNEL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17575608 ↗InjuryDec 21, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. (OMSC) RECEIVED A LITERATURE TITLED "EFFICACY OF THE POCKET-CREATION METHOD WITH A TRACTION DEVICE IN ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR RESIDUAL OR RECURRENT COLORECTAL LESIONS". LITERATURE SUMMARY: THIS STUDY AIMED TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF THE POCKET-CREATION METHOD (PCM) WITH A TRACTION DEVICE (TD) WITH THAT OF CONVENTIONAL ESD FOR RESIDUAL OR RECURRENT COLORECTAL LESIONS IN 72 PATIENTS. THE PRIMARY ENDPOINTS WERE EN BLOC RESECTION AND R0 RESECTION RATES. EN BLOC RESECTION WAS FEASIBLE IN ALL CASES WITH PCM WITH TD BUT FAILED IN 22% OF CASES OF CONVENTIONAL ESD. THE R0 RESECTION RATES FOR PCM WITH TD AND CONVENTIONAL ESD WERE 97% AND 66%, RESPECTIVELY. DISSECTION WAS SIGNIFICANTLY FASTER IN THE PCM WITH TD GROUP (13.0 VS. 7.9 MM2/MIN). THIS STUDY CONCLUDES THAT THE PCM WITH TD IS AN EFFECTIVE METHOD FOR TREATING RESIDUAL OR RECURRENT COLORECTAL LESIONS AFTER INCOMPLETE RESECTION. TYPE OF ADVERSE EVENTS/NUMBER OF PATIENTS: [CONTROL GROUP]. PERFORATION - 1 PATIENT. POST-PROCEDURAL BLEEDING - 1 PATIENT. [PCM WITH TD GROUP]. PERFORATION - 1 PATIENT. POST-PROCEDURAL BLEEDING - 1 PATIENT. ------------------------------------------ SINCE THE LITERATURE
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Perforation
MAUDE report 16031199 ↗
Other Hemostatic Metal Clip For The Gi Tract devices
- Resolution 360 Clip M00521230Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract3 deaths2,291 reports
- Resolution Clip M00522610Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract1,116 reports
- Instinct G58010Cook Incorporated · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract1 recall1,017 reports
- Resolution 360™ ULTRA Clip M00521400Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract3 deaths496 reports
- Instinct G18343Cook Incorporated · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract244 reports
- MANTIS™ Clip M00521420Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract195 reports
- Single Use Repositionable Clip HX-202UROlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract1 recall118 reports
- colonic FTRD Set 14Ovesco Endoscopy AG · Hemostatic Metal Clip For The Gi Tract2 deaths95 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page