Long Clip HX-610-135L (REF N2303930)Recalls & reported problems
Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Long Clip (4)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170209154), received between Aug 19, 2021 and Dec 13, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Physical Resistance/Sticking4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 13, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS REVIEWED A LITERATURE ARTICLE TITLED "EVALUATION OF A NEW METHOD, "NON-INJECTION RESECTION USING BIPOLAR SOFT COAGULATION MODE (NIRBS)", FOR COLONIC ADENOMATOUS LESIONS." THIS RETROSPECTIVE STUDY DEVELOPED A NEW ¿NON-INJECTION RESECTION USING BIPOLAR SOFT COAGULATION MODE (NIRBS)¿ METHOD, ADAPTED FOR COLORECTAL LESIONS. IN ADDITION, WE EVALUATED THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS METHOD. WE PERFORMED NIRBS THROUGHOUT A 12-MONTH PERIOD FOR ALL COLORECTAL LESIONS WHICH SNARE RESECTION WAS ACCEPTABLE WITHOUT CANCEROUS LESIONS INFILTRATING DEEPER THAN THE SUBMUCOSAL LAYER. A TOTAL OF 746 LESIONS WERE RESECTED FROM 375 PATIENTS. THE MAJOR PATHOLOGICAL BREAKDOWNS WERE AS FOLLOWS: 64.3% (480/746) WERE ADENOMAS, AND 5.0% (37/746) WERE INTRAEPITHELIAL ADENOCARCINOMAS (TIS LESIONS). NO RESIDUALS WERE OBSERVED IN ANY 37 TIS LESIONS (MEAN SIZE, 15.3 MM). TYPE OF ADVERSE EVENTS/NUMBER OF PATIENTS. THIS STUDY ONLY EVALUATED MAJOR ADVERSE EVENTS SUCH AS BLEEDING DURING THE PROCEDURE, DELAYED BLEEDING, AND PERFORATION. ¿BLEEDING DURING THE PROCEDURE¿¿PROFUSE BLEEDING THAT OCCURRED FROM THE RESECTED PORTION IMMEDIATELY AFTER RESECTION. ¿DELAYED BLEEDING¿: A LARGE AMOUNT OF FRESH BLEEDING OR BLOODY S
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
MAUDE report 18318645 ↗MalfunctionAug 19, 2021Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER, DURING A PROCEDURE, WHEN THE LONG CLIP WAS ACTIVATED, THE CLIP STUCK TO THE APPLICATOR WHEN SHOOTING. IT DID NOT STICK TO THE MUCOSA. TWO (2) LONG CLIPS MALFUNCTIONED IN THE SAME MANNER DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THE SAME DEVICE WAS NOT USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. THERE WERE TWO (2) OCCURRENCES AT THE FACILITY ON THE SAME DAY WITH FOUR (4) DIFFERENT LONG CLIPS. THIS COMPLAINT IS RELATED TO PATIENT IDENTIFIERS: (B)(6).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12341420 ↗MalfunctionAug 19, 2021Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER, DURING A PROCEDURE, WHEN THE LONG CLIP WAS ACTIVATED, THE CLIP STUCK TO THE APPLICATOR WHEN SHOOTING. IT DID NOT STICK TO THE MUCOSA. TWO (2) LONG CLIPS MALFUNCTIONED IN THE SAME MANNER DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THE SAME DEVICE WAS NOT USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. THERE WERE TWO (2) OCCURRENCES AT THE FACILITY ON THE SAME DAY WITH FOUR (4) DIFFERENT LONG CLIPS. THIS COMPLAINT IS RELATED TO PATIENT IDENTIFIERS: (B)(6).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12341399 ↗MalfunctionAug 19, 2021Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER, DURING A PROCEDURE, WHEN THE LONG CLIP WAS ACTIVATED, THE CLIP STUCK TO THE APPLICATOR WHEN SHOOTING. IT DID NOT STICK TO THE MUCOSA. TWO (2) LONG CLIPS MALFUNCTIONED IN THE SAME MANNER DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THE SAME DEVICE WAS NOT USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. THERE WERE TWO (2) OCCURRENCES AT THE FACILITY ON THE SAME DAY WITH FOUR (4) DIFFERENT LONG CLIPS. THIS COMPLAINT IS RELATED TO PATIENT IDENTIFIERS: (B)(6).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12341369 ↗MalfunctionAug 19, 2021Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER, DURING A PROCEDURE, WHEN THE LONG CLIP WAS ACTIVATED, THE CLIP STUCK TO THE APPLICATOR WHEN SHOOTING. IT DID NOT STICK TO THE MUCOSA. TWO LONG CLIPS MALFUNCTIONED IN THE SAME MANNER DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THE SAME DEVICE WAS NOT USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. THERE WERE TWO OCCURRENCES AT THE FACILITY ON THE SAME DAY WITH FOUR DIFFERENT LONG CLIPS. THIS COMPLAINT IS RELATED TO PATIENT IDENTIFIERS: (B)(6).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12341346 ↗
Other Hemostatic Metal Clip For The Gi Tract devices
- Resolution 360 Clip M00521230Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract3 deaths2,291 reports
- Resolution Clip M00522610Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract1,116 reports
- Instinct G58010Cook Incorporated · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract1 recall1,017 reports
- Resolution 360™ ULTRA Clip M00521400Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract3 deaths496 reports
- Instinct G18343Cook Incorporated · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract244 reports
- MANTIS™ Clip M00521420Boston Scientific Corporation · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract195 reports
- Single Use Repositionable Clip HX-202UROlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract1 recall118 reports
- colonic FTRD Set 14Ovesco Endoscopy AG · Hemostatic Metal Clip For The Gi Tract2 deaths95 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page