DISPOSABLE INJECTOR NM NM-200L-0423Recalls & reported problems
Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04953170381966), received between Feb 23, 2022 and Apr 13, 2022 — classified as 2 injuries.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
Patient problems
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding2
- Shock1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 13, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE ARTICLE: "PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE EFFICACY OF POLYETHYLENE OXIDE ADHESIVE ON PREVENTING DELAYED BLEEDING AFTER GASTRIC ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION" BY YANG YU, ET AL. REGARDLESS OF TECHNICAL ADVANCEMENTS, DELAYED BLEEDING IS STILL A COMMON ADVERSE EVENT AFTER GASTRIC ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD), OFTEN OCCURRING IN THE EARLY POSTOPERATIVE PHASE. THIS STUDY AIMED TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY OF A NEWLY DESIGNED POLYETHYLENE OXIDE (PEO) ADHESIVE FOR PREVENTING DELAYED GASTRIC BLEEDING. PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT GASTRIC ESD BETWEEN (B)(6) 2017 AND (B)(6) 2020 AT THREE (B)(6) INSTITUTIONS WERE RETROSPECTIVELY REVIEWED. PATIENTS RECEIVING PEO APPLICATION ON GASTRIC POST-ESD ULCERS WERE INCLUDED IN THE PEO GROUP, AND PATIENTS WITHOUT THIS PROCEDURE WERE INCLUDED IN THE CONTROL GROUP. TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL BIAS, PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING WAS PERFORMED, AND SEX, AGE, LESION SIZE, LESION MORPHOLOGY, ULCERATION, LOCALIZATION, PROCEDURE TIME, FREQUENCY OF MAJOR INTRAOPERATIVE BLEEDING, RESECTED SPECIMEN SIZE, LESION HISTOPATHOLOGY, SUBMUCOSAL INVASION AND THE TAKING OF ANTITHROMBOTIC DRUGS WERE INCLUDED AS MATCHING FAC
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Shock
MAUDE report 14103872 ↗InjuryFeb 23, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
OLYMPUS REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING LITERATURE ARTICLE: "TRANSPARENT CAP-ASSISTED ENDOSCOPIC SCLEROTHERAPY IN ESOPHAGEAL VARICES: A RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED TRIAL" BY LILI MAA, XIAOQUAN HUANGB, JINGJING LIAN, ET AL.THIS RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE, SINGLE-CENTER STUDY WAS AIMED TO DETERMINE THE FEASIBILITY, EFFICACY, AND COST OF PERFORMING ENDOSCOPIC INJECTION SCLEROSIS (EIS) WITH AND WITHOUT A TRANSPARENT CAP ATTACHED TO THE TIP OF THE GASTROSCOPE. A TOTAL OF 120 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL VARICES WITH OR WITHOUT GASTRIC VARICES WERE ENROLLED AND RANDOMIZED INTO TWO GROUPS, A CONTROL (N=61) AND A TRANSPARENT CAP-ASSISTED (N= 59) GROUP. THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES WERE TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE USE OF A TRANSPARENT CAP COULD REDUCE THE USE OF SALVAGE HEMOSTASIS METHODS WHILE INJECTION HEMORRHAGE COMPARING TO THE ENDOSCOPIC INJECTION WITHOUT A CAP AND TO IDENTIFY THE HEMORRHAGIC EVENTS THAT OCCURRED DURING INJECTION. MOREOVER, IT ALSO AIMED TO DETERMINE THE CONVENIENCE AND THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF USING TRANSPARENT CAP-ASSISTED ENDOSCOPY AND THE POSSIBILITY OF USING THIS TECHNIQUE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. THE STUDY REPORTED A REDUCTION OF AVERAGE INJECTION SITES IN THE TRAN
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
MAUDE report 13586796 ↗
Other endoscopic injection needle, gastroenterology-urology devices
- AcuJect G22526Cook Incorporated · endoscopic injection needle, gastroenterology-urology1 recall1 report
- n.a. 27182AKarl Storz GmbH & Co. KG · endoscopic injection needle, gastroenterology-urology1 recall0 reports
- n.a. 27030NKarl Storz GmbH & Co. KG · endoscopic injection needle, gastroenterology-urology1 recall0 reports
- injeTAK Adjustable Tip Needle 70cm DIS201Laborie Medical Technologies Canada ULC · endoscopic injection needle, gastroenterology-urology1 recall0 reports
- injeTAK Adjustable Tip Needle 35cm DIS199Laborie Medical Technologies Canada ULC · endoscopic injection needle, gastroenterology-urology1 recall0 reports
- Single Use Injector NM-401L-0425Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · endoscopic injection needle, gastroenterology-urology28 reports
- Single Use Injector NM-401L-0423Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · endoscopic injection needle, gastroenterology-urology27 reports
- Single Use Injector NM-401L-0425Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · endoscopic injection needle, gastroenterology-urology26 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page